Jump to content

User:Nicodene/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As Proto-Romance developed into Spanish, it underwent numerous sound changes, an approximate chronology of which is provided below.[1]

Timeline[edit]

– The near-close vowels /ɪ ʊ/ merge with their close-mid counterparts /e o/; cf. /ˈkʊβɪtu/ > */ˈkoβedu/ > OSp. /ˈkobdo/ 'elbow'.[2]

– Syllable-initial /k/ and /ɡ/ palatalize before front vowels.[3]

– /k ɡ/ before a following consonant spirantize to /x/ and then vocalize to /i̯/; /l/ in the sequence /olt/ velarizes and then vocalizes to /i̯/.[4]

  • When followed by /t/, /i̯/ is simply absorbed by a preceding /i/; cf. /ˈfriktu/ > */ɸɾii̯tu/ > OSp. /ˈɸɾito/ 'fried'.
  • When followed by either of the consonants /t s/, /i̯/ raises preceding /a/ to /e/; cf. /'faktu/ > */'ɸai̯tu/ > OSp. /'ɸetʃo/ 'deed'.
  • When followed by any of the consonants /n t s/, /i̯/ raises a preceding /o/ to /u/; cf. /'lʊkta/ > /'loi̯ta/ > OSp. /'lutʃa/ 'fight'.
  • When followed by any of the consonants /l n t s/, /i̯/ raises preceding /ɛ ɔ/ to /e o/; cf. /'kɔksu/ > */'kɔi̯su/ > OSp. /'koʃo/ (not */'kweʃo/) 'crippled'. (The single counterexample is viejo.)
  • If the following consonant is not syllable-final, and does not become so as a result of syncope, then /i̯/ palatalizes it in the following manner:
    • /l/ > /ʎ/
    • /n/ > /ɲ/
    • /t/ > /tʃ/
    • /s/ > /ʃ/
  • After the above, /i̯/ is usually deleted.

– Various consonant clusters undergo assimilation:[5]

  • /rs/ > /ss/
  • /ps/ > /ss/
  • /pt/ > /tt/
  • /mn/ > /nn/
  • /mb/ > /mm/

– Stressed /ɛ ɔ/ diphthongize to /i͡ɛ u͡ɔ/.[6]

  • Subsequently /i͡ɛ u͡ɔ/ > /je wo/, with loss of contrast between open-mid and close-mid vowels; cf. /ˈβɛrsu/ > */ˈβjessu/ > OSp. /ˈβjeso/ 'verse'.
  • /wo/ changes to /we/, possibly by analogy with /je/; cf. /ˈlɔku/ > */ˈlwoɡu/ > OSp. /ˈlweɡo/ 'then'.

– /ɸ/[i] undergoes allophonic changes in the following order:[7]

  • It takes on a glottal or velar articulation, [ʍ] or [hɸ], before newly-formed /w/; cf. /ˈfɔku/ >*/ˈɸwoku/ > OSp. [ˈʍweɡo] 'fire'.
  • It loses its bilabial quality before the rounded ('labial') vowels /o u/, resulting in [h]; cf. /ˈfɔlja/ > */ˈɸoʎa/ > OSp. [ˈhoʒa] 'leaf'.
  • By analogy with the above, it turns to [h] before the non-back vowels /i e a/ and possibly /j/ as well.

– /pj rj sj/ undergo metathesis to /i̯p i̯r i̯s/; cf. /ferˈrarju/ > */ɸeˈrai̯ɾu/ > OSp. [heˈreɾo] 'blacksmith'.[8]

– [ʎ] turns to the fricative /ʒ/; cf. /ˈalju/ > *[ˈaʎu] > OSp. /ˈaʒo/ 'garlic'.[9]

Intervocalic consonants undergo lenition in a chain shift:[10]


[...]

– /j/ may develop into a postalveolar fricative, likely under French influence; cf. /ˈjustu/ > OSp. /ˈʒusto/.

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Derived from Latin /f/. The timing of this change and its underlying causes have been the subject of extensive debate. Various scholars see in it a pre-Roman or Basque influence; some see Latin itself as having originally had a bilabial /ɸ/. Somewhat reconciling the two views, Lloyd (1987: 222) posits that there was an early variation [f~ɸ], with the influence of Basque speakers (who played a prominent role in early Castile) contributing to the 'triumph' of the latter realization in local Romance.
  2. ^ If they had not already done so previously.

References[edit]

  1. ^ Following Penny's chronology (2002: §2.7).
  2. ^ Lloyd 1987: 108–109; Penny 2002: §2.4.2.6
  3. ^ Lloyd 1987: 135–137, 258; Penny 2002: §2.5.2.3
  4. ^ Lloyd 1987: 252–254; Penny 2002: 48–50, §§2.4.2.1, 2.5.2.4
  5. ^ Penny 2002: 75
  6. ^ Ferguson 1976: §7; Penny 2002: §2.4.2.2
  7. ^ Lloyd 1987: 214–216, 322–323; Penny 2002: 92
  8. ^ Penny 2002: §2.5.2.2.6
  9. ^ Penny 2002: §2.5.2.2.2
  10. ^ Penny 2002: §2.5.3.2