User:Philc 0780/Improve me/Admin Coaching

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Ok, here she is!


Sooooo, what now. Philc TECI 21:59, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

First of all, here's a editcount report for you, correct as of 19 August 2006: [1] --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 12:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Also, we should all go through Phil's contribs, and list what each of us feels are Phil's strenghts and weaknesses. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 12:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Oki Doki, so I guess I fill in my POV on my strengths/weaknesses here yeah? Philc TECI 17:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Yeah! --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 04:34, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Editcount[edit]

Interiot's Tool 1 and the edit summary tool have stopped updating and the edit counts are way off; please do not use them. Preferably, use Interiot's Tool 2 or Flcelloguy's Tool

Username        Philc 0780
Total edits     3892
Distinct pages edited   744
Average edits/page      5.231
First edit      04:07, 26 February 2006
        
(main)  1539
Talk    290
User    574
User talk       333
Image   16
Template        84
Template talk   3
Category        7
Category talk   2
Wikipedia       913
Wikipedia talk  122
Portal  9

Last updated: 12:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Editcount report: (as of 19 August 2006) [2]

Strengths[edit]

Phil[edit]

Sam[edit]

Shreshth[edit]

Weaknesses[edit]

Phil[edit]

  • Since joining the project edits have become more foccused on the Ref Desk, and menial random additions to random articles, due to noticing things while surfing. Philc TECI 17:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • When people are undeniably ignorant, arrogant, or stubborn, I tend to tell them what I think of them, which usually ends up violating WP:CIVIL. Philc TECI 19:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
    Well, yes it does, and that sort of thing can be disastrous in an RfA. Personally, when I can't write anything without compromising whatever my point is with incivility, I go off and play N or something for a while. By the time I come back, either I've calmed down and gathered my thoughts, or I've realised that it wasn't very important in the first place. --Sam Blanning(talk) 13:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
    (I did like your point about "blof" having as many Ghits as "decelerate" though. I've no idea why such an obviously useless test of notability still has so much currency.) --Sam Blanning(talk) 13:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
    I'm a quite stuborn myself, though, not really arrogant or ignorant, but this does means I tend to flair up quite easily in conflicts... I know I shouldn't and I'll try not too. I too dont know why something that has 167M hits for porn, and 7M hits for cure for aids can be used to test notability. Philc TECI 18:09, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Sam[edit]

Shreshth[edit]