User:Ppallavi20/sandbox

This is a user sandbox of Ppallavi20. You can use it for testing or practicing edits.
This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course.
To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section.

Get Help

This is the user sandbox of Ppallavi20. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox here.

Other sandboxes: Main sandbox | Template sandbox

Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!

GROUP WORK I have experienced working with a group many times. I don't like presenting in front of people, so doing a group presentation helps me stay calm when I'm presenting. I had experienced when one group member did all the work which is very unfair because all members of the group got credit for the work which they didn't do. I have also experienced where all members of the group did an equal amount of work. I feel it can also be difficult to work in a group because everyone has their opinions and because of that members can have a lot of disagreement and debates. Everyone should compromise when working in a group. Ppallavi20 (talk) 20:16, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

ARTICLE EVALUATIONS (questions 3 & 4) Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

The viewpoints on the article are average I don't believe it is overrepresented because it is stating facts on Esalen. I did seem to find the article be underrepresented in some sections such as early history, founders, gestalt practice developed, develop counterculture workshops, and more. More facts can be added in those parts for the readers. I also feel more can be added to media portrayals. The citation links do work and the support the claims in the article.Ppallavi20 (talk) 21:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)