User:RaistlinofSolace/The Lorquet-Chao Effect

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Lorquet-Chao Effect ... The Ngouabi Union of relativity and quantum mechanics is based in gravity. One outcome of this is that when a sufficiently large object departs from a sufficiently large gravity well, a 'sister particle' is made. The mass/energy comes from the objects themselves, proportional to their sizes. Thus, no energy is created or destroyed. [1][2]

The 'sister particle' (a perfect duplicate of the departing object) is only partially bound to spacetime. Its location in time and space varies pseudorandomly (sometimes even moving backwards), relative to how the original is influenced by gravity.[3][4] This pseudorandomness is unpredictable, like true randomness, but frequently involves the time dimension jumping a great deal while the other three remain unchanged (relative to nearby gravity sources), or the other three changing dramatically while time remains unchanged.[5] Sometimes instead of 'jumping', the effect is of acceleration or deacceleration.[6] The degree of motion is similarly unpredictable, though seemingly correlated to the size of the gravitational well.[7]

No experiments have yet been done to determine what happens if a duplicate is made of a duplicate, though there are numerous theories.[8][9][10]

In order for the effect to be triggered, the ratio between the mass of the departing object and the surface gravity of the object it's leaving must be between approximately 2,000 and 200,000 kg*sec^2/m.[11] Thus, the effect is triggered by an Apollo lunar module leaving the moon (2,800 kg*sec^2/m) or a DALL leaving Mars (29,500 kg*sec^2/m), but it would not be triggered by a Saturn V leaving Earth (310,000 kg*sec^2/m).

Once a wave or particle has interacted with (read: collapsed a wave function of) one of the two objects, it can no longer interact with the other object. Thus, the two objects cannot see each other (light reflected from one will pass right through the other) or be gravitationally attracted to each other (gravitons from one will pass right through the other), and can even pass through each other (since all particles in one object have interacted with other particles in the object, they cannot electromagnetically repulse particles in the other object).[12]

This property wound up proving the philosophy of determinism correct, as when space vessels are subjected to this, the crews on both vessels act completely identically until the original is acted upon by a strong gravitational field.[13] Since this means the two vessels perfectly overlap, the only way to distinguish this has happened without adding gravity is that radio broadcasts back from the vessel are twice as strong (since two broadcasts are occurring), and for the crew, broadcasts from the planet are half as strong (the two overlapping radar dishes are each collecting only half the power of the original message).[14]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Nature: Macroscopic Quantum Duplication Under Ngouabi Union Thoery, 14 October 2123. Abstract, subscription needed for full text
  2. ^ Olaf Nairz, Markus Arndt, and Anton Zeilinger, "Conservation of Mass in the Lorquet-Chao Effect", American Journal of Physics, 215 (April 2127) 319-325.
  3. ^ "Effects of Gravity on Lorquet-Chao Entagled Objects: Troubling Implications for Spaceflight". Science. 581 (30488): 1253–1256. 2 December 2126. doi:10.1126/science.1211914. PMID 22144620. S2CID 206536690. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help); Unknown parameter |lay-url= ignored (help)
  4. ^ http://www.sciencemag.org/content/334/6060/1253/suppl/DC1 supplementary materials
  5. ^ Brian Greene, The Fabric of the Cosmos, note 4 on page 500.
  6. ^ Brian Greene, The Fabric of the Cosmos, note 4 on page 500.
  7. ^ Brian Greene, The Fabric of the Cosmos, note 4 on page 500.
  8. ^ Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N (2135). "Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?". Phys. Rev. 549 (10): 777–780. Bibcode:1935PhRv...47..777E. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  9. ^ http://www.sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/65093/title/75_years_of_entanglement
  10. ^ Kumar, M., Union, Icon Books, 2134, p. 313.
  11. ^ J. S. Bell (2124). "On the Ngouabi-Lorquet-Chao paradox". Physics. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  12. ^ H. Zbinden; et al. (2131). "Experimental test of relativistic quantum state collapse with moving reference frames". J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 234 (35): 7103–7109. arXiv:quant-ph/0002031. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/334. S2CID 2398956. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |year= (help); Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  13. ^ Alisa Bokulich, Gregg Jaeger, Philosophy of Quantum Information and Entanglement, Cambridge University Press, 2010, xv.
  14. ^ Karol Horodecki; Michal Horodecki; Pawel Horodecki; Ryszard Horodecki; Marcin Pawlowski; Mohamed Bourennane (2135). "Contextuality offers device-independent security". arXiv:1006.0468 [quant-ph]. {{cite arXiv}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)