Jump to content

User:Steve2011/RfA

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here are my standards for an RfA. It is based off of Coffee and Coldplay Expert's own RFA standards but some things are different.

NOTE: I may not always !vote based off of these standards.

Criteria Things that may cause me to !vote Oppose Things that may cause me to !vote Neutral of influence my vote for Support or Oppose Things that may cause me to !vote Support
Edit Count The editor has less than 3000 edits. The editor has 3000 - 4500 edits. The editor has 5000+ edits.
Type of edits The editor has few edits other than reverting and warning vandals. The editor is a rollbacker. 1000 edits to the Mainspace and has Rollback.
Edits to... (If you have over 50% to talk pages because of vandal fighting, you are exempt form this certain criteria) The editor has 50% or more of their edits to user talk pages. The editor has 25% of their edits to articles. The editor has above 25% of their edits to articles.
Edit Summaries The editor uses edit summaries less than 60% of the time. The editor uses edit summaries 60% - 70% of the time. The editor uses edit summaries above 80% of the time.
CSD The editor improperly tags articles for CSD. The editor does not do CSD work. The editor tags articles for CSD per the CSD policy.
Amount of time spent on Wikipedia The editor has been actively editing for less than 3 months. The editor has been actively editing for 3 - 5 months. The editor has been actively editing for more than 6 months.
Blocks The editor was blocked less than 6 months ago. The editor was blocked more than 6 months ago. The editor has never been blocked or was blocked on accident.
Explanation of blocks (for edits who have been previously blocked) The editor downplays their block and/or does not explain why s/he was blocked. The editor answers all questions about a previous block after being asked about it. The editor tells the voters about their previous block and answers all questions about it thoroughly.
Civility The editor has a record of being uncivil. The editor is usually civil but can still break when under pressure. The editor is able to work well under pressure, and reacts civilly during disputes.
Answers to questions The editor answers questions uncivilly and interprets policy incorrectly. and/or they answer using cut and paste policy. The editor answers questions in a way that shows that they don't fully understand the policy. The editor answers questions politely and according to policy.
Response to opposes The editor responds to opposes in an attacking and defensive manner. The editor responds to almost every oppose in a polite manner. The editor responds to all opposes in a civil manner.
View of adminship The editor views adminship as symbol power, and thinks that it means that they are better or more important than other editors.. The editor views adminship as a tool maintenance but still sees it as a trophy. The editor views adminship as helping with maintenance.
Admin coaching The editor was not admin coached. The editor was admin coached after an unsuccessful RFA. The editor was admin coached.
Range of participation The editor helps out with only a one or two topics or WikiProjects. The editor helps out in handful of areas of the Wikipedia space, but usually sticks to one topic, or WikiProject. The editor helps out in a wide range of topics and several WikiProjects.

Current RFA's

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Worm That Turned 2 105 0 1 100 09:47, 18 November 2024 6 days, 15 hoursno report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 18:33, 11 November 2024 (UTC)