User:Steve Quinn/Philosophy of Pseudoscience
 | This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's work-in-progress page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. For guidance on developing this draft, see Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Author | Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry |
|---|---|
| Subject | Philosophy of Science, Pseudoscience, 20th Century falsification, Karl Popper, Science and Religion |
| Genre | Nonfiction |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press |
Publication date | August 2013 |
| Publication place | United States |
| ISBN | 9780226051796 9780226051826 (online) |
| Website | Webpage |
Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem is a set of 23 essays that wrestle with the demarcation problem which is the question of how to distinguish between science and non-science. The book's editors are the notable Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry. It was published in August 2013 by the University of Chicago Press.[1][2][3][4]
See also
[edit]- Why People Believe Weird Things by Michael Shermer
- Pseudoscience
- List of topics characterized as pseudoscience
Notes
[edit]- Pigliucci, Massimo; Boudry, Maarten (2013). Philosophy of Pseudoscience. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.001.0001.
References
[edit]- ^ Tatarczak, Michał (2015). "Reviewed work: Philosophy of Pseudoscience. Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, Massimo Pigliucci i Maarten Boudry". Roczniki Filozoficzne / Annales de Philosophie / Annals of Philosophy. 63 (4): 231–239.
- ^ Turner, Derek D. (2014). "Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry. Chicago (Illinois): University of Chicago Press. $35.00 (Paper). Viii + 469 p.; index. ISBN: 978-0-226-05179-6 (Hc); 978-0-226-05196-3 (Pb); 978-0-226-05182-6 (Eb). 2013". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 89 (2): 161–162. doi:10.1086/676054.
- ^ Ambasciano, Leonardo (2017). "Mapping Pluto's Republic: Cognitive and Epistemological Reflections on Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem". Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion. 3 (2): 183–205. doi:10.1558/jcsr.27091.
- ^ Nola, Robert (2015). "The fuzziness of pseudoscience". Metascience. 24 (2): 279–284. doi:10.1007/s11016-014-9970-z. S2CID 254792704.
Further reading
[edit]- Pigliucci, Massimo; Boudry, Maarten (2014). "Prove it! The Burden of Proof Game in Science vs. Pseudoscience Disputes". Philosophia. 42 (2): 487–502. doi:10.1007/s11406-013-9500-z. S2CID 255165276.
- Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Pigliucci, Massimo (2015). "What makes weird beliefs thrive? The epidemiology of pseudoscience". Philosophical Psychology. 28 (8): 1177–1198. doi:10.1080/09515089.2014.971946. S2CID 44612120.
- Boudry, Maarten; Paglieri, Fabio; Pigliucci, Massimo (2015). "The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life". Argumentation. 29 (4): 431–456. doi:10.1007/s10503-015-9359-1. S2CID 254258497.
- Massimo Pigliucci (2018). Nonsense on Stilts. University of Chicago Press. 2nd edition.
External links
[edit]- Official website
- Book's introduction.
- Oxford Academic
- PhilPapers
- "Massimo Pigliucci — How to Live a Good Life and Create a Just Society." Michael Shermer podcast # 320. January 31, 2023.