User:Uhai/XfD log

This is a log of all deletion discussion nominations made by this user using Twinkle's XfD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

August 2022

1. Manas Kumar Ghosh: nominated at AfD; notified Khorang (talk · contribs) 05:09, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Subject fails the criteria for WP:GNG and WP:PROF. The details in the "Early life and education" and "Career" sections are unsupported by the inline references. Several other sections are completely unsourced. The only mentions of the subject in secondary sources, such as in this and this, are trivial mentions, against the second bullet point of WP:GNG. Article overall reads more like a CV than a biography.

September 2022

1. Talk:Unique Personal Identificator: nominated at MfD 23:22, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Orphaned talk page with no content and no content in its history. The link to the 2006 AFD discussion of the article can be found in the deletion summary of the deleting admin in the article's logs, so there's no need to preserve it on this page. The article was recreated in 2014 by a now-globally locked vandal before being deleted again but this still gives no indication as to why its talk page is G8 exempt.

October 2022

1. Rashmi Kumari Ghising: nominated at AfD; notified Bhupendra Shrestha (talk · contribs) 05:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG and WP:ATHLETE. No WP:SIGCOV available: only mentions are trivial, e.g. single sentences about goals she scored, such as here and here

December 2022

1. Cloth mill Offermann: nominated at AfD 15:28, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Non-notable building: fails WP:GNG in that no significant coverage is available in either English or German.

March 2023

1. Systel: nominated at AfD; notified Janardhan3456 (talk · contribs) 07:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Company fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.
     At time of AfD creation, Sources 1 and 2 are trivial coverage/press releases; source 3 is a YouTube video with <100 views of someone's acceptance speech of an award given to the company; source 4 is paywalled for me but if the company is mentioned, it's a trivial mention; sources 5 and 6 do not mention the company by name at all.
     I cannot find any additional sources online that would cause the company to meet the notability criteria. Looking at the article's history, I also strongly suspect UPE w.r.t. its creation and many of its subsequent edits.

April 2023

1. GeminiJets: nominated at AfD; notified IRelayer (talk · contribs) 21:27, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Ref 1 is not independent (interview), refs 2 through 4 are directly from the company's website (or archives of the site), ref 5 can be considered WP:ROUTINE as the COVID-19 pandemic affected many companies, not just this one.
2. John Carey (journalist): nominated at AfD; notified Caranews (talk · contribs) 22:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO.
3. Draft:Kryptomon: nominated at MfD 21:54, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Crypto/NFT spam draft created by now-CU blocked user. Likely UPE with mainspace equivalent Kryptomon having been G11'd after creation by a different, now-blocked account.
4. Draft:Sonatafy Technology: nominated at MfD 21:56, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Likely UPE created by now-blocked sockpuppet account. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonatafy Technology.

June 2023

1. Digital Data Systems: nominated at AfD; notified SignorinaDelba (talk · contribs) 06:46, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NPCORP. As far as I can tell, the article has had no sources in its nearly 10 year existence. Maybe there exists coverage in print media from the time the company existed? I wasn't able to find anything online, however.

November 2023

1. Anarchic Adjustment: nominated at AfD 23:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NCORP: no significant coverage available. Article has been tagged as needing additional citations since 2007 and it seems that's because there simply aren't sources available. A WP:BEFORE revealed this article, but it's an interview with one of the founders so isn't independent. The existing sources in the article appear to be trivial mentions or unrelated.
2. Nick Philip: nominated at AfD 05:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST with no significant, independent coverage available. The books cited in the article appear to be trivial mentions, with the remaining few available sources being interviews. The NY Times source is paywalled but seems to be a trivial mention as well.
     The unsourced claim regarding being a founding contributor of Wired magazine might suggest notability, but there doesn't seem to be any substantiation for this except this, which is of questionable reliability and is an interview anyway. The Wired (magazine) article does not currently mention him by name at all and I've been unsuccessful in finding anything about him on Wired's website itself.
     The article's talk page had someone in 2007 argue for notability but the points appear weak and/or outdated. Regardless, there's a dearth of reliable sources available for many of the claims.
3. User:Ahmed12322/sandbox: nominated at MfD; notified Ahmed12322 (talk · contribs) 18:01, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Previously deleted for WP:U5 by Fastily and re-created six minutes later with identical content. Thinly veiled advertisement as page links to a medical translation website in two places. Tendentious AfC resubmissions with no changes in between submissions.

December 2023

1. Digital world: nominated at AfD; notified Brett Johnston (talk · contribs) 15:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: This article seems more appropriate as a dictionary entry per WP:NOTDICT. There doesn't appear to be much coverage of the term in a way that would support an encyclopedia article, such as a meaningful history.
     The second paragraph of WP:NEO applies to this article: while there's plenty of evidence of use of the term, there's little coverage about the term itself. As an example, the source for a statement in the article about the term predating the World Wide Web is misattributed, firstly, and links to an unrelated paper from 1958 that uses the term once. Said statement is WP:OR.
2. Francisco J. Blanco: nominated at AfD; notified Pascualjaime (talk · contribs) 01:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails every point of WP:NACADEMIC along with WP:GNG.