Jump to content

User talk:GCmatters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi GCmatters! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:19, Thursday, January 19, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi GCmatters! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:54, Thursday, January 19, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi GCmatters! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:01, Monday, January 23, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi GCmatters! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:02, Monday, January 23, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, GCmatters!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, ─ The Aafī (talk) 15:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "GCmatters", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears, based on your user page, to imply the account is used by multiple people (GC Matters is a group ...). If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. JeffUK 15:31, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Radical feminism. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 02:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

could you explain where I added my own point of view to this article? GCmatters (talk) 15:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You added text such as (i.e. men) to mentions of Trans woman, which goes against the neutral statement that transgender women are women. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 15:31, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
how is it a neutral statement that transgender women are women? This is not true or verifiable, they are Men GCmatters (talk) 15:42, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
where is your evidence dudhr? we are supposed to be dealing in facts here, not opinions GCmatters (talk) 15:43, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
are you sure you are a neutral editor? GCmatters (talk) 16:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
where is the Verifiability and Original Research required by Wikipedia? GCmatters (talk) 16:54, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia does not require, or allow, original research. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 16:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Most reliable sources in gender-related topics agree that transgender women are women. As Wikipedia follows what is said by reliable sources, we also state that they are women. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 16:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
what reliable sources are you referring to? Where is the original research? Scientists, biologist and radical feminists do not believe this or that anyone can change sex GCmatters (talk) 17:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Again, original research is not allowed on Wikipedia. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 17:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
what reliable sources are you referring to? GCmatters (talk) 17:07, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@GCmatters, you need to cite a published reliable research to support any fact. What any movement believes or what our individual belief is, cannot be established as a legitimate source. If the fact that "Scientists, biologist and radical feminists do not believe this or that anyone can change sex" has got a reliable and verifiable citation, I feel this should be fine for inclusion as a WP:RSOPINION ─ The Aafī (talk) 17:11, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Have you heard of Baron Dr. Robert Winston, doctor and scientist who has declared publicly on tv and other forums that you cannot change sex, your sex is evident in every chromosome and DNA, when you die your ashes will show that you are either male or female. Check him out on wikipedia GCmatters (talk) 11:59, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently been editing gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

– dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 16:24, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

where is the Original Research required here? Radical feminists do not believe that trans women are men, and self-id is not law in the UK GCmatters (talk) 16:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
where is the Original Research required here? Can you clarify your question? As I said previously, original research is not allowed on Wikipedia. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 16:59, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
what Original Research proves that men can become women? where are the citations for this in this article. This is a statement of belief, not fact GCmatters (talk) 17:04, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The reliable sources cited at Trans woman (e.g. the source[1] cited for the statement Transgender women, sometimes called male-to-female (MtF), are those who were assigned the male sex at birth (AMAB), but who identify and live as women., which states in table 1: Transgender woman (also: trans woman, male-to female, transgender female): This refers to individuals assigned male at birth but who identify and live as women.) support the statement in wikivoice that transgender women are women. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 18:26, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Hembree, Wylie C; Cohen-Kettenis, Peggy T; Gooren, Louis; Hannema, Sabine E; Meyer, Walter J; Murad, M Hassan; Rosenthal, Stephen M; Safer, Joshua D; Tangpricha, Vin; T’Sjoen, Guy G (2017-09-13). "Endocrine Treatment of Gender-Dysphoric/Gender-Incongruent Persons: An Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline". The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 102 (11): 3869–3903. doi:10.1210/jc.2017-01658. ISSN 0021-972X. PMID 28945902. S2CID 3726467.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GCmatters&oldid=1175155978"