Jump to content

User talk:Andrewrp: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Lesserm to last revision by Andrewrp (HG)
No edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:


If you have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AFeatured_picture_candidates&diff=293577708&oldid=293563156 an issue] with the closing, please feel free to let me know and we can discuss it. '''[[User:Wadester16|<span style="color:darkred">wadester</span>]][[User talk:Wadester16|<span style="color:darkblue">16</span>]]''' 20:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
If you have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AFeatured_picture_candidates&diff=293577708&oldid=293563156 an issue] with the closing, please feel free to let me know and we can discuss it. '''[[User:Wadester16|<span style="color:darkred">wadester</span>]][[User talk:Wadester16|<span style="color:darkblue">16</span>]]''' 20:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

== Nancy Drew Article ==

Please don't delete the entire Ransom of the Seven Ships page again. If you disagree and decide to delete it anyway, please first read my comment on the discussion page of said article. The grounds for such total deletion were faulty, and the articel is 100% verifiable. Seriously, please don't delete it again! [[User:Bob o&#39;clock|Bob o&#39;clock]] ([[User talk:Bob o&#39;clock|talk]]) 22:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:05, 6 June 2009

Hi! I'm Andrew, and I like photography and computers. I am also interested in music. I play the violin and piano.

A Clean Slate

Please see my archive for archived conversations. AndrewrpTally-ho! 20:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned

This edit is not exactly in the spirit of WP:BITE. This user isn't a vandal; he's just someone who didn't understand the rules and got angry when he didn't understand your warning. He's likely to be a potential useful editor once he learns his way around. Why not be nice to him? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree I could of have been nicer. I can get angry sometimes. Also, this comment will NOT be archived, until I archive all again. AndrewrpTally-ho! 18:35, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I've archived things I just didn't want to look at, too. :) -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I still won't AndrewrpTally-ho! 18:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revert and warning for User:Studioghiblitotoro

I think you may have been a little too zealous with your recent templated castigation of subject editor. See my response to your comment on his talk page. Thanks for your efforts, though. --Kbh3rdtalk 01:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies on the Rocco Perri edit

Hello Andrewrp, just wanted to apologise for the botched editing tonight on the Rocco Perri article. I misread the article history, it's the old too tired to edit and should quit while I'm ahead thing. Cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 01:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis Hammerson

Please can you reconsider the tag you have put on Lewis Hammerson - he was the founder of what is now probably Britain's biggest property business. Dormskirk (talk) 15:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With respect, google is not the sole criteria for notability. The issue is that he founded Britain's largest property company. Dormskirk (talk) 15:42, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at my edit history you will find that I am working on a project to improve the quality of all FTSE 100 articles and their founders and have already made about 20,000 entries with that objective. Please can you reconsider? Dormskirk (talk) 15:50, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FPC Closing

If you have an issue with the closing, please feel free to let me know and we can discuss it. wadester16 20:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Drew Article

Please don't delete the entire Ransom of the Seven Ships page again. If you disagree and decide to delete it anyway, please first read my comment on the discussion page of said article. The grounds for such total deletion were faulty, and the articel is 100% verifiable. Seriously, please don't delete it again! Bob o'clock (talk) 22:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]