User talk:Harout72

MJ

Hi there.

With regard to the recent edit/revert on

Please note that the edit was in good faith; in conjunction with cubs197 (talk · contribs) we looked at the request to edit this semi-protected page, we checked out the references, we checked the FA on MJ, and there was no reason not not make the edit.

I certainly did not intend to "ignore the hard work", as you said in the edit summary; we are all trying to make Wikipedia better, and I do appreciate your intentions too.

That said: due process means that I should now start a discussion on the talk page, and try to help reach a consensus on the issue. I have started this, in Talk:List of best-selling music artists#Michael Jackson (again). I look forward to your comments there; I remain perfectly neutral, and all I can do is try to facilitate a policy-based reasoned, agreeable decision based on what everyone thinks.

Best wishes,  Chzz  ►  21:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Page protection

User:Johnali123 got off his 3RR block and put Michael Jackson higher up on the list again at List of best-selling music artists. He has been 3RR warned again but since this dispute continues, I requested full page protection to get him and User:Mjlouisdbz14 to the talk page to discuss their edits. Momo san ^Gespräch 16:04, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

i tried to put mj higher but i didnt no how to edit that well and michael jackson sold 750 million not 350 million. write back--Mjlouisdbz14 (talk) 00:31, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Looks like a possible sockpuppet maybe in the mix, User:Passwordpass. I made a sockpuppet report to confirm my findings, SPI Report. Momo san ^Gespräch 16:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

i am not i have give the right sources

http://www.michaeljackson.com/ie/news/michael-jacksons-it-be-presented-theaters-around-world http://press.sonymusic.com/2009/06/26/sony-comments-on-the-passing-of-michael-jackson http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1614815/20090626/jackson_michael.jhtml http://edition.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Music/03/05/uk.jackson.comeback/ http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/26/2609049.htm 2) http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/Story?id=8050704&page=1 3) h ttp://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/WinterConcert/wireStory?id=7075284 4) h ttp://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/07/06/entertainment/michaeljackson/main5137816.shtml 5) http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/06/entertainment/main3461884.shtml 6) http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1614815/20090626/jackson_michael.jhtml 7)http://cbs2.com/entertainment/michael.jackson.hospitalized.2.1059895.html http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/arts/music/26jackson.html?_r=1 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/25/AR2009062503127.html http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/wpix-michael-jackson-heart-attack,0,6959872.story http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29531056/ http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Showbiz-News/Michael-Jackson-Memorial-Service---In-Numbers/Article/200907115331455 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8121749.stm 14) http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/f27ec8db-af05-4f36-916e-3d57f91ecf5e etc

please read all of them they say 750 million —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnali123 (talk • contribs) 22:57, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

I have seen them all, and they all look like they have copied the figures from each other.--Harout72 (talk) 23:25, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

WQA

Hello, Harout72. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC)