Jump to content

User talk:Mygerardromance: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bbcody (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 115: Line 115:
My mommy said i was helping and she was right about the tooth fairy. [[User:Bbcody|Bbcody]] ([[User talk:Bbcody|talk]]) 18:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
My mommy said i was helping and she was right about the tooth fairy. [[User:Bbcody|Bbcody]] ([[User talk:Bbcody|talk]]) 18:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
:Haha (oh boy are you amusing). I don't know about the whole tooth fairy thing, but I know that you edits aren't as helpful as you think they are. Maybe you should read [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|this]]. [[User:Mygerardromance|Mygerardromance]] ([[User talk:Mygerardromance#top|talk]]) 18:33, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
:Haha (oh boy are you amusing). I don't know about the whole tooth fairy thing, but I know that you edits aren't as helpful as you think they are. Maybe you should read [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|this]]. [[User:Mygerardromance|Mygerardromance]] ([[User talk:Mygerardromance#top|talk]]) 18:33, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Will you read it to me? It's too long and filled with BIG words. How are you today?

Revision as of 18:35, 14 December 2008

Welcome to my talk page!

Please keep these in mind when conversing with me:
  • Sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~).
  • Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A Descriptive Header==.
  • I will only respond to queries on my page on my page. I will respond to queries on your page solely on your page.
Talk page guidelines*

Please respect etiquette* and assume good faith*. Also be nice* and remain civil*.

Talk Archives: June 2007-Jan 2008 * Sep 2008 * Oct 2008 * Nov 2008 *

(Click on the asterisks[*] to link to Wikipedia pages.)


Why did you send me a message about being unhelpful.

I would like to know what i did wrong. I properly went to a page that i noted had been vandalized and recovered it. Then i got a message saying i was being unproductive. When i went back to the article Angus Young you reverted my change and then reverted it back. Was this just a mistake? Snacks tasty (talk) 00:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, that was just a mistake. I am pretty sure that I had also reverted the warning on your talk page. I apologize for any inconvenience this gave you. Mygerardromance (talk) 14:42, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i didnt mean to just extremely bored promise it wont happen again —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.99.169.107 (talk) 21:38, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL just what i was thinking about

i was thinking about vandals that turned into anti-vandals.. and i saw your profile just now. i had seen it again from the fierce Huggle antivandalism of yours. nice. --CuteHappyBrute (talk) 01:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I was merely amusing myself, and is laughter not the fuel of life?

And no, this is not vandalism, Just I rarely bother editing on wiki's so cannot be bothered to find an appropriate space. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pamew (talkcontribs) 14:59, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hate you hugglers

Man do I hate you! ;-) Not really. You beat me to the warning of User Talk:199.216.194.140 regarding mammal. I had to remove my own warning, and I thought I had been FAST! My hat's off to you! NightFalcon90909 (talk) 20:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The same thing used to happen to me all the time before I started using Huggle. I know your frustration. Keep trying though! Mygerardromance (talk) 20:36, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WTF?

Ok I was just online looking up things on my project for school and I started to get these messages. I would kindly like to know why your threatening me for things I didn't do...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.236.80.127 (talk) 23:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well it may have not been you personally but someone from that ip address is vandalizing. I was just doing what i'm supposed to do and give warnings. Mygerardromance (talk) 23:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why? galleries are supposed to be at wikicommons.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.181.102.108 (talk) 00:02, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for catching (and reverting) some vandalism on my user page today! :-) Killiondude (talk) 06:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from me, too. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:01, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

for reverting the vandalism on my user talk page.--Captain-tucker (talk) 21:33, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great Stuuf

For all your hard work on vandalism reverting! Andy (talk) 22:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Stunray

Just a reminder: if someone appears to have a vandalism-only account and has not recieved the 3 warnings or the 4im one, please don't report it to AIV. It clogs up the page since we have to put the request on hold. --wL<speak·check> 18:29, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't report Stunray. I believe you are talking about an IP user. Sorry about that I was using huggle and it just gives the next warning. I didn't know they only had one warning. Sorry. Mygerardromance (talk) 18:30, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I reported him, actually. It seems to me that the warning of vandalism-only accounts is largely a matter of personal taste, and to me (and, as far as I can tell, to many admins who patrol AIV) it seems like a rather outrageous courtesy to AGF with users who actually take the initiative to register an account and then go straight to being a pain in the rear. It's like vandalizing a store after you've applied to work there. Unlike our unlucky prospective cashier, however, Wikipedia users can ask for a second chance with the unblock template, or they can try again under a new name. Cosmic Latte (talk) 18:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Pages

I've been told not to tag Talk Pages for spam. I just delete the spam now and add 'Spam removed'. Apparently if the talk page is deleted, the 'offender' has no way of knowing what happened. I've done a few that way now. Seems to work. User Pages, yes I tag them. Peridon (talk) 20:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriate warning

Hi - I'd like you to reconsider the level of warning you gave at User talk:24.105.174.74#December 2008. Whether you agree or not with my disdain for level 1 warnings to vandalism-only accounts, I would suggest that issuing yet another level 1 warning following two warnings already this month accomplishes nothing. A quick look at the contribution history shows seven vandalism edits in the last three days. Are you sure another level 1 warning is best? Cheers --RexxS (talk) 14:04, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about that, but I was using huggle which it gives the warning it feels appropriate to give. I have been having some problems with that lately too. If I would have seen that I would have definitely not given another level 1 warning. I understand your frustration and will make sure that whatever I use from now on will give out appropriate warnings. Once again I apologize. Mygerardromance (talk) 18:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologise - especially as I forgot to thank you for the anti-vandalism work in the first place! Keep up the good work --RexxS (talk) 04:30, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly explain how my edit to the John Hopkins page constituted vandalism. I added an accurate quote that Professor Hopkins uses routinely. In addition, I have added an edit summary as requested. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.218.159.6 (talk) 17:45, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I rollbacked the page to your edit. Do you mind putting that quote in the Notable Quotes section. I had thought that it was vandalism at first because it was in a different section. If you would kindly move it, I would appreciate it. Sorry Mygerardromance (talk) 17:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. I must say, however, that the heights of absurdity to which the Wikipedia sturmtruppen have risen has permanently soured me on the site. Deterring people from making basic, non-controversial edits will kill this site slowly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cryptos3 (talkcontribs) 17:53, 14 December 2008 (UTC) == Hello == Hi Bbcody (talk) 18:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Mygerardromance (talk) 18:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Having fun? Why don't you start fighting the vandalism instead of adding to it? Mygerardromance (talk) 18:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would never vandalise i'm trying to help Bbcody (talk) 18:14, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Well when I look back at most of your contributions, it looks as though they are vandalism. Really we could use your help fighting it. Mygerardromance (talk) 18:18, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's me again

Hi. I help. I help good. I contribute you should thank me Bbcody (talk) 18:24, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't deny that you are contributing, but you are contributing to the vandalism. Your contributions aren't helping the articles. Mygerardromance (talk) 18:26, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My mommy said i was helping and she was right about the tooth fairy. Bbcody (talk) 18:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haha (oh boy are you amusing). I don't know about the whole tooth fairy thing, but I know that you edits aren't as helpful as you think they are. Maybe you should read this. Mygerardromance (talk) 18:33, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will you read it to me? It's too long and filled with BIG words. How are you today?