Jump to content

User talk:Mygerardromance: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 257948386 by Hydrogen Iodide (talk) he wasn't vandalizing
Bbcody (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 116: Line 116:
:Haha (oh boy are you amusing). I don't know about the whole tooth fairy thing, but I know that you edits aren't as helpful as you think they are. Maybe you should read [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|this]]. [[User:Mygerardromance|Mygerardromance]] ([[User talk:Mygerardromance#top|talk]]) 18:33, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
:Haha (oh boy are you amusing). I don't know about the whole tooth fairy thing, but I know that you edits aren't as helpful as you think they are. Maybe you should read [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|this]]. [[User:Mygerardromance|Mygerardromance]] ([[User talk:Mygerardromance#top|talk]]) 18:33, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


Will you read it to me? It's too long and filled with BIG words. How are you today?
Will you read it to me? It's too long and filled with BIG words. How are you today? [[User:Bbcody|Bbcody]] ([[User talk:Bbcody|talk]]) 18:37, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:37, 14 December 2008

Welcome to my talk page!

Please keep these in mind when conversing with me:
  • Sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~).
  • Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A Descriptive Header==.
  • I will only respond to queries on my page on my page. I will respond to queries on your page solely on your page.
Talk page guidelines*

Please respect etiquette* and assume good faith*. Also be nice* and remain civil*.

Talk Archives: June 2007-Jan 2008 * Sep 2008 * Oct 2008 * Nov 2008 *

(Click on the asterisks[*] to link to Wikipedia pages.)


Why did you send me a message about being unhelpful.

I would like to know what i did wrong. I properly went to a page that i noted had been vandalized and recovered it. Then i got a message saying i was being unproductive. When i went back to the article Angus Young you reverted my change and then reverted it back. Was this just a mistake? Snacks tasty (talk) 00:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, that was just a mistake. I am pretty sure that I had also reverted the warning on your talk page. I apologize for any inconvenience this gave you. Mygerardromance (talk) 14:42, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i didnt mean to just extremely bored promise it wont happen again —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.99.169.107 (talk) 21:38, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL just what i was thinking about

i was thinking about vandals that turned into anti-vandals.. and i saw your profile just now. i had seen it again from the fierce Huggle antivandalism of yours. nice. --CuteHappyBrute (talk) 01:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I was merely amusing myself, and is laughter not the fuel of life?

And no, this is not vandalism, Just I rarely bother editing on wiki's so cannot be bothered to find an appropriate space. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pamew (talkcontribs) 14:59, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hate you hugglers

Man do I hate you! ;-) Not really. You beat me to the warning of User Talk:199.216.194.140 regarding mammal. I had to remove my own warning, and I thought I had been FAST! My hat's off to you! NightFalcon90909 (talk) 20:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The same thing used to happen to me all the time before I started using Huggle. I know your frustration. Keep trying though! Mygerardromance (talk) 20:36, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WTF?

Ok I was just online looking up things on my project for school and I started to get these messages. I would kindly like to know why your threatening me for things I didn't do...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.236.80.127 (talk) 23:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well it may have not been you personally but someone from that ip address is vandalizing. I was just doing what i'm supposed to do and give warnings. Mygerardromance (talk) 23:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why? galleries are supposed to be at wikicommons.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.181.102.108 (talk) 00:02, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for catching (and reverting) some vandalism on my user page today! :-) Killiondude (talk) 06:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from me, too. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:01, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

for reverting the vandalism on my user talk page.--Captain-tucker (talk) 21:33, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great Stuuf

For all your hard work on vandalism reverting! Andy (talk) 22:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Stunray

Just a reminder: if someone appears to have a vandalism-only account and has not recieved the 3 warnings or the 4im one, please don't report it to AIV. It clogs up the page since we have to put the request on hold. --wL<speak·check> 18:29, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't report Stunray. I believe you are talking about an IP user. Sorry about that I was using huggle and it just gives the next warning. I didn't know they only had one warning. Sorry. Mygerardromance (talk) 18:30, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I reported him, actually. It seems to me that the warning of vandalism-only accounts is largely a matter of personal taste, and to me (and, as far as I can tell, to many admins who patrol AIV) it seems like a rather outrageous courtesy to AGF with users who actually take the initiative to register an account and then go straight to being a pain in the rear. It's like vandalizing a store after you've applied to work there. Unlike our unlucky prospective cashier, however, Wikipedia users can ask for a second chance with the unblock template, or they can try again under a new name. Cosmic Latte (talk) 18:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Pages

I've been told not to tag Talk Pages for spam. I just delete the spam now and add 'Spam removed'. Apparently if the talk page is deleted, the 'offender' has no way of knowing what happened. I've done a few that way now. Seems to work. User Pages, yes I tag them. Peridon (talk) 20:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriate warning

Hi - I'd like you to reconsider the level of warning you gave at User talk:24.105.174.74#December 2008. Whether you agree or not with my disdain for level 1 warnings to vandalism-only accounts, I would suggest that issuing yet another level 1 warning following two warnings already this month accomplishes nothing. A quick look at the contribution history shows seven vandalism edits in the last three days. Are you sure another level 1 warning is best? Cheers --RexxS (talk) 14:04, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about that, but I was using huggle which it gives the warning it feels appropriate to give. I have been having some problems with that lately too. If I would have seen that I would have definitely not given another level 1 warning. I understand your frustration and will make sure that whatever I use from now on will give out appropriate warnings. Once again I apologize. Mygerardromance (talk) 18:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologise - especially as I forgot to thank you for the anti-vandalism work in the first place! Keep up the good work --RexxS (talk) 04:30, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly explain how my edit to the John Hopkins page constituted vandalism. I added an accurate quote that Professor Hopkins uses routinely. In addition, I have added an edit summary as requested. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.218.159.6 (talk) 17:45, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I rollbacked the page to your edit. Do you mind putting that quote in the Notable Quotes section. I had thought that it was vandalism at first because it was in a different section. If you would kindly move it, I would appreciate it. Sorry Mygerardromance (talk) 17:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. I must say, however, that the heights of absurdity to which the Wikipedia sturmtruppen have risen has permanently soured me on the site. Deterring people from making basic, non-controversial edits will kill this site slowly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cryptos3 (talkcontribs) 17:53, 14 December 2008 (UTC) == Hello == Hi Bbcody (talk) 18:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Mygerardromance (talk) 18:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Having fun? Why don't you start fighting the vandalism instead of adding to it? Mygerardromance (talk) 18:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would never vandalise i'm trying to help Bbcody (talk) 18:14, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Well when I look back at most of your contributions, it looks as though they are vandalism. Really we could use your help fighting it. Mygerardromance (talk) 18:18, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's me again

Hi. I help. I help good. I contribute you should thank me Bbcody (talk) 18:24, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't deny that you are contributing, but you are contributing to the vandalism. Your contributions aren't helping the articles. Mygerardromance (talk) 18:26, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My mommy said i was helping and she was right about the tooth fairy. Bbcody (talk) 18:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haha (oh boy are you amusing). I don't know about the whole tooth fairy thing, but I know that you edits aren't as helpful as you think they are. Maybe you should read this. Mygerardromance (talk) 18:33, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will you read it to me? It's too long and filled with BIG words. How are you today? Bbcody (talk) 18:37, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]