User talk:Xbcj0843hck3

I have never deleted any article. Please see my reply at my talk page for advice. 84user (talk) 16:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

My deletion rationale was "notability not asserted", rather than "not notable". The content you supplied - "She is an American neurobiologist. She is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Her lab is located in Rockefeller University, where she is the Chemers Family Associate Professor and Head of the Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Behavior" - this is better than saying "she has two legs, two eyes, ten fingers, and went to university", but not by much. There are many neurobiologists. There are many people at the Hughes institute. There are many associate professors. There are many laboratory heads. What makes Dr Vosshall special? Is there anything?

... oh, there is? All that stuff you posted to my talk page? Hmm.

Looks good. But how was I supposed to know? You didn't include it in the article.

So here's what we'll do. You will write a new article on Dr Vosshall, and you will include all the stuff about the awards she's won. Actually show why she's notable, from the beginning. Once that's done, I'll merge the old versions into the history. Sound good?

Oh, and when you said "I don't necessarily disagree with increasing the baseline anonymity required for a scientist to get his own page" - you meant 'notoriety', not 'anonymity'. DS (talk) 19:02, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Response

Oh, calm down. I was rude, you were rude, I apologize.

Will you write a fresh article now? DS (talk) 02:54, 11 June 2009 (UTC)