User talk:00X
November 2009
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page William Blake has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Jusdafax 16:51, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page William Blake. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jusdafax 16:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Philip Dunne (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. |
Syrthiss (talk) 17:13, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
00X (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
No a sockpuppet of Philip Dunne. Who, by the way, is philip Dunne? I have never met this person.
Decline reason:
Even if you are not a sock, you are still a vandal account. Declined. -Jeremy (v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!) 19:49, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.