User talk:103.21.175.89

December 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Deltaspace42. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dana Kirkpatrick without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 10:38, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Dana Kirkpatrick, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. JohnLaurensAnthonyRamos333 (correct me if I'm wrong) 19:48, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was a correction to facts and added balance. 103.21.175.89 (talk) 06:54, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but the first deleted version was not complete. I was writing the correct version. Nothing sinister going on. 103.21.175.89 (talk) 06:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I'm not experienced in the subject, so I'm going to stay out of this one. As long as you provide an adequate edit summary, go ahead and continue with your editing to the page. JohnLaurensAnthonyRamos333 (correct me if I'm wrong) 07:13, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being civil. JohnLaurensAnthonyRamos333 (correct me if I'm wrong) 07:14, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you were already told, you deleted part of the article and didn't give a reason in the edit summary. Please explain why it was a "correction to facts and added balance" next time. Thanks, JohnLaurensAnthonyRamos333 (correct me if I'm wrong) 06:56, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much. I will do better if I edit anything on this website again. Sorry for not being more specific with my correction; I did not know you had to do that. Lesson learned. 103.21.175.89 (talk) 07:31, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Don't beat yourself up about it. It was an honest mistake anyone could have made. It's okay to edit more, just be careful. JohnLaurensAnthonyRamos333 (correct me if I'm wrong) 07:34, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.