User talk:103.39.128.89

August 2023

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to British war crimes. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:37, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

that's not a promotional or inappropriate links. I am going to use this links in article for references. 103.39.128.89 (talk) 08:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at British war crimes, you may be blocked from editing. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:43, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mate, two of my ancestors were killed at Jallianwala Bagh. There is no censorship here, just the need to be sourced by reliable citations as war crimes, which they are not. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:46, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So why did you remove whole section. There are citation in Jallianwala Bagh also. You haven't checked the source. There are approx 1000 killed because of open fire in protest against British. 103.39.128.89 (talk) 08:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is not a war crime—it did not take place during wartime, and it was not undertaken by combatants in action. None of the incidents you have listed, no matter how reprehensible, can be defined as a war crime. The citation does not support the claim that it was a war crime. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:52, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the definition in the same page. It clearly says what are considered war crimes. And many news site also considers this as a war crimes like https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/worst-atrocities-british-empire-amritsar-boer-war-concentration-camp-mau-mau-a6821756.html 103.39.128.89 (talk) 08:55, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You will find that that link specifically says "worst atrocities". It does not use the words "war crime". Please provide links that specifically state that Jallianwala Bagh was a war crime. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:33, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Elvish Yadav

Any more information just ask me on my talk page, and I’ll add it to the page. - Moosa1312

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.