Jump to content

User talk:119.74.58.51

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2018

[edit]

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of National University of Singapore people, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Northeast Petroleum University. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Donner60 (talk) 03:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to List of National University of Singapore people. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Donner60 (talk) 03:09, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to NUS Business School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 03:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not add or change content without an explanation in the edit summary and without verifying it by citing a reliable source, or in the alternative, in the case of a notable person, by a link to a Wikipedia article about the person. Your edits to List of National University of Singapore people add names of persons who may be notable but their identity and notability is not established in your edits by a link to a Wikipedia article about them or to reliable, verifiable, third party sources. See also Wikipedia:Five Pillars, Wikipedia:Citing sources, Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and Help:Footnotes. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nanyang Technological University. Donner60 (talk) 03:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Shellwood (talk) 11:18, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jauerbackdude?/dude. 12:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at NUS Business School. You have been warned several times. Gab4gab (talk) 23:56, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 01:37, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.