User talk:153.165.135.190

Hot Sugar

Hi there, you seem to be misunderstanding the purpose of WP:BLP. A neutrally-written and thoroughly referenced section is valid for inclusion. Why do you think it should be removed? NekoKatsun (nyaa)

Hot Sugar, the subject of the article, called these allegations "false and disparaging." He also stated that they "are co-conspirators who have engaged in libel and slander, among other unlawful acts, against [Hot Sugar] over the course of years including recently through various social media publications such as Twitter and Wikipedia." 153.165.135.190 (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Then what you would want to do is find a source for that statement and include that in the article, not simply remove the claims. You also just broke 3RR; I'll be moving the allegations to the talkpage and expect to see them returned to the article by you once you've found a source for the rebuttal. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 23:20, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

If someone restore the content to the article, Hot Sugar may file a defamation lawsuit against him/her again. In the previous lawsuit filed in 2018, Hot Sugar "initially sought at least $100,000 in damages." I don't wanna get sued for restoring the content. 153.165.135.190 (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:153.165.135.190 reported by User:Gaelan (Result: ). Thank you. Gaelan 💬✏️ 23:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

---