User talk:172.58.217.103

SoHo Square (Manhattan)

@Daniel C. Boyer: Please do not again attempt to add your painting to the article on SoHo Square (Manhattan), unless you can show by a citation from a reliable source that it is considered to be notable. Do not try this using this account, either of the two IP accounts you've utilized (172.58.217.103 and 172.58.171.64) or any other IP. Deliberately editing with an IP to avoid scrutiny of your edits is a violation of our policy on sockpuppets, as is creating a new account for that purpose. Such activities can get you blocked from editing for sockpuppetry. Continuing to add your own non-notable painting is a violation of WP:PROMO, and can get you blocked for being disruptive as well. Wikipedia is not a promotional or advertising medium. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

I'm not sure what is behind any of this or your evidence for it if any... --Daniel C. Boyer (talk) 22:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

What's behind this is exactly what's stated above, you are not allowed to use Wikipedia to promote your work without some proof that they are notable, and if you continue to do so, I will bring the extensive evidence of your doing so to the attention of administrators. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:45, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

There seem to be many unwarranted and unsupported assumptions and question-begging beyond much of what you are saying and I am unaware of what such evidence would be. Further, I am unclear as to what are the standards of notability not related to a standalone article but details in an article. Would you please clarify what you are saying about this? --Daniel C. Boyer (talk) 23:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

You can Wikilawyer all you want. You know what you are doing, and I know what you are doing, and it's going to stop. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:10, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

I believe mind reading is outside of the rules and spirit of Wikipedia, which you seem to have misread in several ways. --Daniel C. Boyer (talk) 05:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

---