Jump to content

User talk:186.154.57.225

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2024

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's policy against harassment.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Izno (talk) 23:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

186.154.57.225 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Excuse me, where's the "Harassment"? I am not harassing anyone, on the contrary, I am reporting their bad actions. Or what do you call a person who doesn't let another contribute here on Wikipedia? If you revert an edit without references, it is valid, but it reverts what someone else did with all including sources, that is not right. 186.154.57.225 (talk) 23:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below. The idea that adding a source makes something immune from reversion is....dubious at best. 331dot (talk) 07:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My apologies, you should have been blocked for clear block evasion, but I didn't see that before issuing the block. Izno (talk) 00:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]