User talk:2001:18C0:61C:700:A96A:AAA7:3688:1448

January 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Discoverer 17, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 06:52, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Unnecessary Edits

Thus far a lot of your edits have been deemed excessive and unnecessary. When they are undid or reverted you ignore the user's explanations and continue to modify them with the same edits. The articles are not supposed to read like documentaries based on your personal preference, they are supposed to be simplified and concise. Please refrain from making further unnecessary edits and replying with soft threats such as "leave this image alone".--Killamin7 (talk) 13:35, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Tdc42 Hello, why did you remove all my additions referenced on the pages like DISCOVERER 17 (experiments). It is Mission 9012 (see Corona (satellite) - Launches). Can we talk more fully about the erasure of all my modifications by Killamin7 without any discernment. I acknowledge having made a mistake in removing sources on DISCOVERER 17. Best regards. 2001:18C0:61C:700:A96A:AAA7:3688:1448 (talk) 17:52, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Tdc42 was not responsible for removing all your edits. The reason I removed them was highlighted as "disruptive editing". The prime examples were both the DISCOVERER 17 and the Dragon 2 "In-flight abort test" articles. You were adding way too much & unnecessary information to the sections, way too many images, and making changes to certain elements that didn't need to be changed. Also you were not responding to our numerous warnings including the one posted up top by Mr.Sarcastic. You also didn't comment about most if not all the changes you made other than the blatant one towards me which was "Leave this image alone". As a result I rollbacked most of your changes on all the pages you edited due to the similarity in editing to the Dragon 2 IFA section that you modified. You really need to refrain from the massive unnecessary changes and be more constructive & concise. The articles are supposed to read more like a simple dictionary and not to your personal preference, which was pretty much a copy-paste essay with a bunch of quotes like you did on the "In-flight abort test". If you do not take head to the warnings you will find yourself in this situation again, if not worst.--Killamin7 (talk) 19:41, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---