Jump to content

User talk:2001:56A:F402:E400:F452:CB53:DEF9:15CD

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm GalianoP3. I noticed that you recently removed content from National Council of Canadian Muslims without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GalianoP3 (talk) 20:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon,
It is quite clear that the article has essentially been vandalized from the original post.
There are multiple fallacious claims in the new article. For example, it states that a co-founder of NCCM was associated as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land case. Every link that is assoicated to simply does not link back to the suggested assertion, with the exception of Tom Quiggin - who was found to have spread defamatory content in relation to this issue: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/islamic-relief-muslim-charity-canada-terror-1.6870177
The article now has essentially an extremely biased core thesis: that NCCM supports Hamas, and did not condemn Hamas after October 7. This is simply categorically false, as can clearly be seen here: https://x.com/nccm/status/1711459194597970419?s=46&t=Epn9DhxSOy3w6LpH0_VpOQ
https://x.com/nccm/status/1766326939529441617?s=46&t=Epn9DhxSOy3w6LpH0_VpOQ
And dozens more too numerous to count.
From an editorial perspective, it seems quite clear that the article has simply been re-written with an attempt to smear the reputation of NCCM, without much regard to actually linking to fact.
It also seems that the editor believed that UNRWA funding should not have been restored. That is a fair argument to make, but the writing is highly biased and not-sourced.
Given all of this, the page should be restored to its pre-existing state. 2001:56A:F402:E400:F452:CB53:DEF9:15CD (talk) 21:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.