User talk:208.53.231.240

Block

You seem to have added an empty section. If you were trying to appeal your block, you need to use the {{unblock}} template and provide a reason. Jackmcbarn (talk) 05:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

208.53.231.240 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

There was no personal attack in the user's complaint at ANI, and the blocking administrator didn't identify any other disruptive editing. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=970718928 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=970889909 For the record, I'm a relative of the accused user, and Wikipedia blocked me too. 208.53.231.240 (talk) 05:57, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Duplicate of unblock request at User talk:208.53.224.161. Continue like this and you'll see the block extended and you'll see talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 10:51, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---