User talk:217.19.215.60
Appearance
June 2021
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be harmful and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated harm may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Super Ψ Dro 15:25, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- So removing direct insults added by politically biased editors is unconstructive in your opinion? 21:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- Please stop with your POV editing. Read WP:COMMONNAME, the common name in English for Transnistria is not Pridnestrovie, but Transnistria. You can try to change this but earlier proposals have been unsucessful Talk:Transnistria#Requested move 30 January 2021 Talk:Transnistria#Title bias. Super Ψ Dro 21:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- Did the local Romanian editors decide that Nazi insult is a "common name" in English? What should I "try to change" when it's absurd? Why did they decide that they could discriminate, insult, attack, and justify war crimes with impunity using Wikipedia? 217.19.215.60 (talk) 22:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- Do you really expect anyone to agree with your point when you are basically claiming those who use Transnistria try to justify "war crimes"? Also, why do you add nationality labels? Wikipedia has its rules and there also is WP:CONSENSUS, you can try to change Wikipedia's rules or the existing consensus about Transnistria's names (even if earlier attempts were unsuccessful), but you can't just change anything to whatever you like. Also, this is your last warning. If you continue your vandalism, you will be reported. Care also to read WP:No personal attacks. Super Ψ Dro 13:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- This is not a point of view. This word refers exclusively to war crimes and came back into circulation precisely in an insulting and dismissive context during the period of the Moldovan-Pridnestrovian conflict. This is a fact that no one disputes. I am not labeling by nationality, I am simply describing the situation that has developed here, which I just saw: a group of editors and administrators arbitrarily sets their own rules here and promotes their political views (positioned as "consensus" and "neutral point of view"). You can block my IP range, it will be logical on your part, given this attitude towards the population of the whole region and the memory of hundreds of thousands of victims of the genocide, because, for obvious reasons, I will not make any contribution to offensive articles, but any other adequate person, simply out of ignorance of the situation, will try to remove these aggressive attacks in the texts. 217.19.215.60 (talk) 05:57, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Again, if you don't agree with the use of Transnistria, you can start a discussion on its talk page. I just repeat previous attempts have been unsucessful (and maybe you know already). By the way, "Transnistria" was used well before World War II, and probably WWI too. You need sources for your claims. Super Ψ Dro 09:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- With whom do you propose to me to discuss this, with a bunch of local a priori engaged editors? I read that discussion you gave me the link to. It is easy to see that no argument can convince them. What sources do you need? The term mentioned could have been used in colloquial Romanian since 1918, when they occupied Bessarabia; it acquired its official meaning and corresponding use in 1941. In 1992, it began to be used by Romanian nationalists as an offensive and pretentious name for Pridnestrovie, again, only in Romanian. Even local provocateurs do not argue with this. Its use in English is unacceptable and is a provocation.
- Again: I recommend that you block the IP range of Pridnestrovie and, in general, the entire exUSSR, in order to avoid, as you said, "vandalism", because any unbiased reader, fluent in English and versed in the theme of Eastern Europe, will correct this. 12:42, 9 June 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.19.215.203 (talk)
- Again, if you don't agree with the use of Transnistria, you can start a discussion on its talk page. I just repeat previous attempts have been unsucessful (and maybe you know already). By the way, "Transnistria" was used well before World War II, and probably WWI too. You need sources for your claims. Super Ψ Dro 09:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- This is not a point of view. This word refers exclusively to war crimes and came back into circulation precisely in an insulting and dismissive context during the period of the Moldovan-Pridnestrovian conflict. This is a fact that no one disputes. I am not labeling by nationality, I am simply describing the situation that has developed here, which I just saw: a group of editors and administrators arbitrarily sets their own rules here and promotes their political views (positioned as "consensus" and "neutral point of view"). You can block my IP range, it will be logical on your part, given this attitude towards the population of the whole region and the memory of hundreds of thousands of victims of the genocide, because, for obvious reasons, I will not make any contribution to offensive articles, but any other adequate person, simply out of ignorance of the situation, will try to remove these aggressive attacks in the texts. 217.19.215.60 (talk) 05:57, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Do you really expect anyone to agree with your point when you are basically claiming those who use Transnistria try to justify "war crimes"? Also, why do you add nationality labels? Wikipedia has its rules and there also is WP:CONSENSUS, you can try to change Wikipedia's rules or the existing consensus about Transnistria's names (even if earlier attempts were unsuccessful), but you can't just change anything to whatever you like. Also, this is your last warning. If you continue your vandalism, you will be reported. Care also to read WP:No personal attacks. Super Ψ Dro 13:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- Did the local Romanian editors decide that Nazi insult is a "common name" in English? What should I "try to change" when it's absurd? Why did they decide that they could discriminate, insult, attack, and justify war crimes with impunity using Wikipedia? 217.19.215.60 (talk) 22:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- Please stop with your POV editing. Read WP:COMMONNAME, the common name in English for Transnistria is not Pridnestrovie, but Transnistria. You can try to change this but earlier proposals have been unsucessful Talk:Transnistria#Requested move 30 January 2021 Talk:Transnistria#Title bias. Super Ψ Dro 21:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you harm Wikipedia. Super Ψ Dro 20:10, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- So what are you waiting for, why is this incompleteness? I wrote about this above. After all, only you do harm, resisting many attempts to correct the dirt that you pour into the articles. I understand that the topic of Pridnestrovie is too insignificant, the general aggression is directed against the Russians as a nation as a whole, but here we are talking about the attacks of Romanian nationalists on topics that they do not like, using lies, insults and provocations. 07:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.19.215.203 (talk)
- I'll even simplify the task for you. Here are the ranges of IP addresses related to the largest Internet provider of Pridnestrovie: 31.31.0.0 - 31.31.31.255; 37.26.128.0 - 37.26.143.255; 62.221.64.0 - 62.221.127.255; 77.235.96.0 - 77.235.127.255; 80.94.240.0 - 80.94.255.255; 95.153.64.0 - 95.153.127.255; 217.19.208.0 - 217.19.223.255. You can block it. 217.19.215.203 (talk) 08:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |