User talk:218.155.136.167

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2019 Polish General Election[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Opinion polling for the 2019 Polish parliamentary election. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Opinion polling for the 2019 Polish parliamentary election, you may be blocked from editing.


But how is this possible then? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationwide_opinion_polling_for_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries#Polling_aggregation

DON'T IGNORE IT!!! YOU SHOULD DELETE THOSE POLLING AVERAGE ON THAT LINK IF YOU THINK YOU ARE DOING A FAIR ACT, Impru20

Polling averages provided by reliable, independent sources would not constitute original research. Your own, self-calculated and self-published averages are original research. See the difference there and stop trying to use Wikipedia to promote yourself, or you will be reported. Impru20talk 12:10, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And The Ones On This Page are also definitely self-calculated. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationwide_opinion_polling_for_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries#Polling_aggregation

WHY DID YOU DELETE THOSE INDEPENDENT SOURCES of GEUN/GEHSC ON Other Election Pages??? They Had INDEPENDENT SOURCES, PAGES

Those are you own calculated averages, published either in Google spreadsheets or in online blogs. Check the relevant Wikipedia policy on self-published sources. Cheers. Impru20talk 12:16, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All Independent Sources Should Be Kept Same. Nowadays are not Imperialism Era or something like that. Go And Read On Universal Declaration of Human Rights

On this part, check Wikipedia's policy on righting great wrongs. It is as simple as understanding that you can't use Wikipedia as your personal mean for promotion or your vehicle for turning your calculation into notorious content. Impru20talk 12:21, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


That's exactly you're doing! So, I think you should check-out Wikipedia's policy on righting great wrongs yourself.

WP:RGW refers to things such as victimizing yourself because of you thinking the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is not being applied in Wikipedia. Not to other things such as reprimanding you for breaching some of the core Wikipedia policies, such as WP:SOAP, WP:FORUM, WP:V, WP:SPS and WP:OR. You do not have the right to publish your own self-made content in Wikipedia because that's not what Wikipedia is for, so you have really very little to complain about here. Cheers. Impru20talk 12:26, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


What on earth are you joking???? Cyber World And Real World Should Be kept Same. According To Your Words, are you saying Wikipedia is a Empire ruled by you????

Please, check the relevant Wikipedia policies I just linked to you above. Wikipedia is ruled by its policies and guidelines, and I'm sorry to inform you that you are not above them. You still can't use Wikipedia as a mean to promote your personal agenda. Impru20talk 12:30, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also noting that you removed my latest warning; however, I'm informing you that this is still visible in the page's history, so your behaviour removing will only be seen as proof that you did read it. Impru20talk 12:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, Saw It.
Once again: Wikipedia is not a mean to promote yourself nor a publisher of original thought. Stop adding your self-made projections into opinion polling articles. Thank you. Impru20talk 20:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2020[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:21, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2020[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:43, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.