User talk:24.113.49.10

Wichita Massacre

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wichita Massacre. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Arxiloxos (talk) 04:58, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:09, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. KrakatoaKatie 05:54, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.113.49.10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I know for a fact that this article is targeted with pc bias. ALL OF THE ABOVE refrences i have provided and are currently provided state RACIAL motivation even from pc bias newspapers. investigate the talk page yourself. i clearly tried to show consensus. a willingness to explain the facts and PROOF of my claims in the TALK page. not a single person refuted the refrences and just "decided" to revert because it wasnt thier POV when its clearly stated POV motivations are not allowed. yet im the one who is blocked and banned from my neutral stand point by admin sockpuppet accounts. im black and im being racist on my own people? i think not. why do they state that this site is available to edit by everyone if certain MODERATORS are clearly infringing and constantly breaking the rules? i dont think i will be editing here any more seeing as noone is allowed to edit unless its okay with the all powerful administrators beliefs.

Decline reason:

I see no references used in your additions. I see no attempt to edit according to WP:CONSENSUS. Clear requirement to block to prevent damage to the encyclopedia (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:02, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Logging in

Hi. Going forward, please log in if you have an account here on Wikipedia. Editing while not logged out to avoid scrutiny or make it seem like multiple editors are involved when they aren't is a violation of Wikipedia policy and may result in you being blocked from editing. Thanks. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

---