Jump to content

User talk:24.148.141.38/archive1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes

[edit]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. The links you added to the page Marvel vs. Capcom series have been removed. Please do not add commercial links—or links to your own private websites—to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. -Benbread 00:24, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Danny Lilithborne 00:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. The links you added to the page Versus fighting game have been removed. Please do not add commercial links—or links to your own private websites—to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. -Benbread 00:39, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.

Sango123 00:40, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|did not see warning until it was too late}}

Hello,

I thought the whole idea of wikipedia was to offer information about the subject? If my link was removed because of "spam," then why do you allow the other links that are currently there?

- Shoryuken.com (the online center of competitive Street Fighter) is actually just a blog and a forum and offers virtually no information about this game, however it is on almost every page that has anything to do with a Capcom Fighting Game.

- Evolution Fighting Game Championships (largest annual fighting game tournament in the Western Hemisphere) is a website for advertising tournaments.

I see Gamefaqs.com listed on other pages.

So, you can hopefully see why I assumed my link would be useful, as it deals with move lists for fighting games. Also, because this is the first time I have attempted to edit, I didn't even know about the talk page until I was blocked.

Thanks a lot.

Those links are probably only there because no-one has removed them yet. Two wrongs (or three wrongs) don't make a right. When your block expires, you may remove them yourself if you don't feel they comply with Wikipedia:External links. However, you were warned well in advance of your block and I'm not inclined to lift it. --Sam Blanning(talk) 11:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (ESkog)(Talk) 01:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


This is your last warning. Stop mucking up my page. You accuse me of vandalising pages? What pages have I vandalised, that is what I would like to know?


The Rule Clearly States:


Removing warnings 

   Removing warnings for vandalism from one's talk page is also considered vandalism. However, after a reasonable time has elapsed, archiving one's talk page, including the vandal warning, is acceptable. Editors may be subject to a minor block for archiving prematurely so as to hide warnings.

First of all, I never vandalized any pages. I received a warning for deleting a small Criticism section on the Dead or Alive (video game series) page. I made this edit because I didn't feel that it should be there. It was clearly personal preference. Is it fact that many gamers feel alienated that DOA uses too much sex to sell their games? The game is the best selling fighting game on the market and that is a fact.

I should not have gotten a "vandalism" warning for deleting that section, because, according to WIKIPEDIA's rules, vandalism is intentionally trying to destroy or mess up a page. It clearly says in the area describing vandalism, that noone should receive a warning or be blocked for making a single edit that someone else doesn't deem appropriate.

So, get over it, Danny.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:24.148.141.38/archive1&oldid=1140894156"