User talk:2600:1700:7B9E:E830:3011:5110:5DD4:4B4

May 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Indian New Zealanders. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RomeshKubajali (talk) 22:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Why does a wiki page about history of ethnic group not reven religious has a section on religious extremism? 2600:1700:7B9E:E830:3011:5110:5DD4:4B4 (talk) 22:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mohan Dutta, you may be blocked from editing. The "unreferenced claim" you remove was referenced. Please stop removing content based on your religious opinions. RomeshKubajali (talk) 22:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Would you care to explain how removing statements of claim made without any references vandalism? 2600:1700:7B9E:E830:3011:5110:5DD4:4B4 (talk) 22:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

The claim you removed was referenced (see reference). RomeshKubajali (talk) 22:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

The article refers to one tweet from a non verified user. How was the account verified and how it could not made by a bad actor? Either add the particular article along with a verified reference or remove the statements of claims made without verified references. Unverified social media handles do not suffice as verified claims. 2600:1700:7B9E:E830:3011:5110:5DD4:4B4 (talk) 23:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

No matter how wrong you believe the article is, it is a reliable source that is acceptable for referencing claims on Wikipedia. You need more than just your own Original Research to remove a claim supported by a reliable source. RomeshKubajali (talk) 23:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop adding statements of claims that are based on unverified social media handles. Would you like to mention an article written about you based on an unverified social media handle? Would you have an article calling you a criminal based on an unverified social media handle? 2600:1700:7B9E:E830:3011:5110:5DD4:4B4 (talk) 23:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Indian New Zealanders. RomeshKubajali (talk) 22:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as done at Indian New Zealanders.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Q ^{T C} 23:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

---