User talk:2601:188:180:1481:2C:5F1F:6A04:8E55

February 2019

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to East Boston seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

• Oshwah, please take another look. Thank you from Bob, 2601:188:180:1481:2C:5F1F:6A04:8E55 (talk) 20:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
• Btw, I wash my hands of that article. Perhaps you can assist the new user there. 2601:188:180:1481:2C:5F1F:6A04:8E55 (talk) 20:44, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Crap! Sorry Bob! I saw this edit and thought maybe it was a test? I didn't notice your previous changes which appear to be just fine. I'll restore those changes. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

My bad on that edit--I tried for a less 'explosive' word and gummed things up. Cheers, 2601:188:180:1481:2C:5F1F:6A04:8E55 (talk) 20:59, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

No problem. To be fair, I gummed up the revert by also reverting the previous edits you made and not just that one... :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:06, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Waheed Zafar Qasmi

TonyBallioni, since I can no longer access the article, and had intended to revert the sock's latest edits, I'll make two requests: can you or another registered account revert the unsourced content, and perhaps block the disruptive account, too? Thank you. I'm heading out on business for a few days. Cheers, 2601:188:180:1481:156F:81B:FD85:2BB1 (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

I protected so I don't want to revert. Maybe k6ka will? TonyBallioni (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

@TonyBallioni: Well, Ponyo stole my edit right out of my mouth. Oh well. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 20:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, all! 2601:188:180:1481:156F:81B:FD85:2BB1 (talk) 20:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

It was noted in the discussion I started yesterday at ANI that Pcheeku (talk · contribs) looks a lot like a block evasion of Tcheeku (talk · contribs). Even without that, is there any reason they're not blocked? 2601:188:180:1481:156F:81B:FD85:2BB1 (talk) 20:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

2601:188:180:1481:156F:81B:FD85:2BB1 (talk), I just filed a SPI on your behalf. However, it does not seem that Tcheeku and ShirazQ are related exactly. They made conflicting edits. ―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 22:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, Matthew J. Long, but ShirazQ (talk · contribs) is the alternate of Shiraz Qasmi (talk · contribs). Tcheeku (talk · contribs) was an evasion of Pcheeku (talk · contribs). Altogether, both editors, using multiple accounts, were disrupting related articles about members of the same family. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:44, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

---