Jump to content

User talk:2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why?

[edit]

While I agree this editor is probably WP:NOTHERE, I'm curious why you're reporting an editor that hasn't had a single edit in almost 4 days, the instructions at AIV are pretty clear. PRAXIDICAEšŸŒˆ 16:59, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • If an admin feels the report is dated and the account is not disruptive, they're free to make that call. Thank you for your concern. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 17:05, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Reporting days old accounts to AIV is disruptive and a waste of everyone's time. See The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. and This page is intended only for reports about active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers PRAXIDICAEšŸŒˆ 17:07, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    If you find the report disruptive, please template me or report me to the appropriate noticeboard. Otherwise, please deal with truly disruptive accounts and leave me in peace. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some BLP issues

[edit]

Drmies, could you have a look at this user's latest addition of 'controversies' [1] to a few BLPs? There's some POV going on there, methinks. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 03:39, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted that hoaxy draft. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 00:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Covid vandal has returned, added monkeypox to their interests

[edit]

Drmies, our disease-happy friend has found another IP range to circumvent your three month block [2]. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 05:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, here's a neat one. Longtime WP:BLP issues about a fairly disagreeable notable. The content I reverted had been up over two months. May not rise to the level of defamation, since it appears to be essentially true. But it could be that some page protection is warranted. What think you? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 22:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23, Favonian, as the two admins most recently involved with a user block and page protection, please have a look to see if new sanctions are merited. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 05:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Drmies, can you check for block evasion by the IP? Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 02:25, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]