User talk:2fries

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Visual_snow. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Jointedcook48 (talk) 02:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Visual_snow, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jointedcook48 (talk) 15:21, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Visual_snow. Jointedcook48 (talk) 00:26, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Jointedcook48 with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:56, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Visual snow. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Calmer Waters 17:45, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Visual snow

The external links you restored at Visual snow all violated Wikipedia:External links #Links normally to be avoided. I have already started a discussion on the talk page, but you have not done the courtesy of explaining, even with an edit summary, your reasons for restoring them. I expect you to engage on the article talk page if you feel that you can make a case why you should be able to ignore Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --RexxS (talk) 21:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]