User talk:3l1t1st

Drop a message and I'll get back to you as soon as I can.

Biohydrogen

Thanks for your note. My sense was that biohydrogen had become too much original research and soapbox, i.e. editors were using this article to speculate on research directions or make judgement on its benefits. The article is slimmer now but less speculative and is more neutral. The literature of "biohydrogen" is filled with hyperbole and often written by individuals with little specific knowledge of the area. One way to open a discussion on the topic would be to make suggestions on the Talk:Biohydrogen or in fact you can revert wholly or in part my edits. An excellent overview is now available at hydrogen production. My advice is most newer editors find it useful to make a series of smaller edits to diverse subjects vs extensive edits to a single topic. I hope that you continue to contribute or engage in a discussion. I look forward to learning more about your interests or concerns. Happy editing and with best wishes,--Smokefoot (talk) 22:10, 12 December 2009 (UTC)