User talk:405footballfan
June 2021
[edit]You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:
- Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Orange Mike | Talk 02:17, 17 June 2021 (UTC)405footballfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Accept reason:
Would you consent to the adding of "fan" to your username? (or you may propose a different username of some other kind so it looks less like an official club account) 331dot (talk) 10:02, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Leigh Veidman for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leigh Veidman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nehme1499 23:36, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Leigh Veidman is the manager of a second division club in the US that has competed in multiple US national cups, why would he not be notable enough for a Wikipedia article? According to Wikiprojext football this is complete grounds for an article 405footballfan (talk) 00:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Can you comment on the discussion page? Nehme1499 01:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
I tried my best, don’t know if I formatted it correctly 405footballfan (talk) 13:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Yep, all is good. Nehme1499 14:29, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, can you please add sources to all statements made in the article? Also, there is a lot of unnecessary info (such as the season-by-season records, mentions of Twitter users, etc.). Make sure to format dates correctly (so, July 7, 2018, not 7/7/2018), and to format the article, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Clubs. Nehme1499 14:37, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- To find older versions of websites, you can use web.archive.org. By the way, thanks for adding the sources :) Nehme1499 19:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for May 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Final X, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)