Jump to content

User talk:42ekalbdivad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Nadia from Sheffield (Video) has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\byoutube\.com' (link(s): http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=t4D12Kujw7E) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 22:13, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Nadia Nyce

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Nadia Nyce, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G4 - previously deleted via a deletion discussion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadia Nyce), substantially identical to the deleted version (User:Webwarlock/Nadia Nyce), and any changes do not address the reasons for which the material was deleted.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Muchness (talk) 23:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Nadia from Sheffield (Video), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.freewebs.com/kingfulani/. As a copyright violation, Nadia from Sheffield (Video) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Nadia from Sheffield (Video) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]