User talk:46.233.77.157

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to Denzel Washington. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (46.233.77.157) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! No Great Shaker (talk) 07:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why your post keeps getting removed[edit]

On the microscopic chance you're not just WP:BKFIP again, Berean Hunter's edits where reverting a sockpuppet of a community banned user per WP:BANREVERT. Any other non-banned editor would be free to undo those edits. Should BH have been more careful? Maybe, but the user behind BKFIP should also fuck off.

That said, anyone who knows how to hunt for diffs the way you do should also be familiar with WP:BANREVERT and WP:NOTVAND anyway, so I highly doubt your report was in good faith.

You were given an explanation -- Don't feed the trolls.

If you "really" are not that long-term abuse case (or some other one), then stop acting like it. It's that simple. Ian.thomson (talk) 08:34, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the text "Do Not trust wikipedia" to Wikipedia is an act of vandalism. There are no circumstances in which this is not true. I reported this destructive behaviour in good faith.
In what possible way am I acting like a long-term abuse case? What you know about me is that I edited 16 articles to improve them, clearly linking to the policies and guidelines that I was following, and then reported an act of vandalism that I had noticed.
"the user behind BKFIP should also fuck off" - maybe so. They have clearly made you very angry. What possible reason to you have to imagine that I am something to do with them? 46.233.77.157 (talk) 08:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"You were given an explanation -- Don't feed the trolls" - that is not an explanation that anyone gave me, nor is it even an explanation at all. It is a personal attack that you have made against me. 46.233.77.157 (talk) 08:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

46.233.77.157 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I reported vandalism by an administrator (the vandalism: [1], [2]. My report: [3]). In what appears to be a systematic attempt at a cover-up, three unrelated editors, none of whom I have ever encountered before, have removed my report, each one linking to WP:DENY. The third editor to remove my report has now blocked me for a week, with a block message that clearly shows they have no idea who I am. Administrators should not vandalise Wikipedia, for any reason, ever. I should not be blocked for reporting an act of vandalism. 46.233.77.157 (talk) 08:37, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Obvious WP:LTA/BKFIP. Talk page access revoked. Favonian (talk) 08:57, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To note: I've now noticed that the administrator carried out one of their acts of vandalism not once but twice. The instance I reported came two days after the first time they did it: [4]. Adding the text "Do Not trust wikipedia" to Wikipedia once is bad enough; doing it twice? Unbelievable. 46.233.77.157 (talk) 08:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

46.233.77.157 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am the victim of a truly bizarre cover-up attempt. As I have documented, an administrator vandalised Wikipedia. And yet, my report has led me to be attacked and slandered. Administrators should not vandalise Wikipedia, for any reason, ever. I should not be blocked for reporting an act of vandalism. 46.233.77.157 (talk) 09:12, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Banned means banned. Talk page access revoked – again. Favonian (talk) 09:17, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.