User talk:61.0.219.155

This IP address has been blocked from editing, because it has been used to evade blocks on one or more other IP addresses and accounts. If you believe there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock. To do so, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of the talk page of your original account. JBW (talk) 13:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla ok.you can keep guessing entire life which ip is a sock of which account.its absolutely pointless. But i dont think you understood anything that i just mentioned in my appeal. Or maybe you wilfully ignored it. Sometimes you just gotta listen unless you 'personaly' have problem with someone or some ideology.and also why i was 'personaly' blocked was never clear.based on accusations? Without aany proper investigation? Some editor pinged their prefered admin to block someone whos viewpoint is breaking their years of deceptive work.did you even bother to read my appeal? Neways its more about you admins ego at this point.i get it.dont unblock me but for god sake listen what i have to say.aaaah leave it.bye .you all are eggs of same hen. All will break at the same time.goodnight or day 61.0.219.155 (talk) 20:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

61.0.219.155 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I kindly request you all to review my edit history. I never targeted any specific editor. The editor who accused me and led to my block interrupted a discussion he was not part of. He initiated interaction by deleting comments and edit requests based on suspicion. He had already raised a sockpuppet investigation. Couldn't he even wait for the result of the investigation? Despite this, he continued deleting, which made me frustrated. Upon searching his contribution history, I found a fault and reverted it. I don't understand why I am being penalized. I never continuously pursued this or any other editor as he claims. He came after me and got me blocked for supporting a question in the Vinayak Damodar Savarkar talk page. He is deleting the main first comment on which the discussion is ongoing. I understand he wants to cancel others but admins should be more wise.This block feels extremely unfair.atleast keep an eye out

Decline reason:

Obviously the same person as 61.0.214.114. Blocks apply to the person, not just the IP address. You personally are blocked for a month (unless you are evading a block on an account, in which case you personally are blocked until that account is unblocked). Yamla (talk) 19:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.