User talk:65.30.184.231

Libertarian Party (United States)

Hello, I'm AlexanderLevian. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Libertarian Party (United States) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Alexander Levian (talk) 02:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

I notice that you keep changing the membership numbers on Libertarian Party (United States). The source currently cited list the registration of "Libertarians" at 411,250 and the registration of "Others" at 1,618,073 [1]. There has been a discussion of this for the last four days and none of the people adding 1.5/1.6 million claim have participated. Please join the the discussion at the talk page.Alexander Levian (talk) 04:44, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. I am asking you for the second time to join in the discussion on the talk page instead of edit warring. Alexander Levian (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Waukesha, Wisconsin  with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Madison, Wisconsin, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

---