Jump to content

User talk:67.181.140.49

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome from EWS23[edit]

Hello! My name is Eric, and it's my pleasure to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. I've noticed you've started making contributions, which is a great thing! On that note, I'd like to invite you to create an account. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

  • The use of a username of your choice
  • The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link
  • Your own user page
  • Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address
  • The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you
  • The ability to rename pages
  • The ability to upload images
  • The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website
  • The eligibility to become an administrator
  • The right to be heard in votes and elections
  • Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and stay for a long time. No matter whether you choose to create an account or not, I hope you will continue to be a productive (not destructive) member of our community as we strive to make this one of the greatest sites on the world wide web.

EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 00:47, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]




Thanks for adding the links to Caspian Depression. — BRIAN0918 • 2005-10-31 15:47

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nathan Griffin, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nathan Griffin

Unnotable subject


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nathan Griffin, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Rocky Fain, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Rocky Fain

Unnotable subject


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Rocky Fain, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision (magazine)[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Decision (magazine), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Eliz81 02:53, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Hughes[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tim Hughes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Tim Hughes. Harland1 18:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tim Hughes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable figure outside Christian circles. Signed to small indie record label.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andrew Duffell (talk) 16:31, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I have nominated Tim Hughes, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Hughes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Andrew Duffell (talk) 18:39, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The New Century Family Money Book for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The New Century Family Money Book is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New Century Family Money Book until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:55, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MOPS International for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MOPS International is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOPS International until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – S. Rich (talk) 22:03, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article O2 Optix has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NPRODUCT. Unambiguously promotional.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ploni (talk) 16:07, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]