Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --digital_me(Talk)(Contribs)00:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless of how many users support an AfD, the article should go through the process. If Benne is the only one asking for deletion, then there really shouldn't be an issue, and the article won't be deleted. If someone nominated "the Jewish article", odds are that it would not go through the process, because it would be hard to find legitimate reasons for such an AfD to occur.--digital_me(Talk)(Contribs)00:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been using antagonistic edit summaries and engaging in edit warring with other users. This attitude is considered to be unhelpful in writing an encyclopaedia. Your user account may receive a temporary block the next time you engage in such behaviour. Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. — Gareth Hughes11:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you have placed an inflammatory remark at Talk:Assyrian people. You have already been warned about your uncivil conduct and your account will now be blocked for 24 hours. When your account becomes operable again, you may continue to edit Wikipedia. You will be expected to abide by Wikipedia's civility policy, and may now be summarily blocked for infringement of it. — Gareth Hughes12:23, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
