Jump to content

User talk:69.166.116.149

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2023

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 1 week for persistent WP:unsourced additions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanjagenije (talk) 15:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
this is ridiculous, and racist. How can someone from a different nationality pretend to dictate geographical names to mountains that belong to a different country.
Why am i even blocked? what guidelines were broken? based on what ridiculous reason was i blocked? 69.166.116.149 (talk) 19:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanjagenijeyou belong to a different country and you should not be given yourselves the privilege of dictating on how to call a geographical place that you have no conenciton with. 69.166.116.149 (talk) 19:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanjagenije (talk) 23:48, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have blocked me before this message was written in your wall. You have blocked me based on assumptions and subjective reasons. You take advantage of the fact that @Wikipedia (not my real name)has given you the privilege of being an editor and you exploit this privilege.
I would not have not bothered to write in your wall if i would bot have been blocked first.
i tried to modify content, and you blocked me. When i wrote in your wall, you gave the false and unscrupulous reason that i am blocked because of personal attacks.
You blocked me because your personal and subjective ideas are too narrow and do not have place for a different point of view. 69.166.116.149 (talk) 04:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You called me "racist" twice ([1][2]). Please, provide some evidence of my racism. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:53, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
you blocked me before my email was written. you blocked me the first time you saw me editing the page of Albanian Alps with their name changed to Accursed Mountains.
You are trying to impose your points of views to a topic that you have no expertise. You belong to a different country (Serbia) and you want to dictate your point on view in geographic places that are part to a different country (Albania).
The moment you realized that, you blocked me right away; and that my friend is a sign of racism whether you like to admit t or not.
Hope @wikipedia looks into this, and re evaluate your status of being a grand editor! 69.166.116.149 (talk) 06:13, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.166.116.149 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here @wikipedia, please help me unblock my account. @Vanjagenije is blocking me for personal reasons

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 01:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.