Jump to content

User talk:78.1.41.95

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2024

[edit]

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cult film, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 04:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

YOu violated the the 3-revert rule in Cult film. you may be blocked from editing. - Altenmann >talk 04:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Onced again, please us the article talk page Talk:Cult film to discuss your suggestion. - Altenmann >talk 04:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Cult film shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:78.1.41.95 reported by User:CanonNi (Result: ). Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as done at Cult film.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 15:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.