User talk:80.3.128.5

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. CryptoDerk 15:29, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

---

What page does this chastisement relate to? I have had the lease on this IP address for a while, but I can't remember ever editing Wikipedia from it. However, there are four other users on it. If you're going to address comments to users who are identified by their IP address rather than their account, please be a bit more specific about what you are talking about. A specific article in which the transgression occurred would be a start! Thanks, the Anonymous current owner of 80.3.128.5

That would relate to all today's edits except the one above - mostly Premier League clubs like Liverpool F.C.. All these links point to wagertowin.co.uk. If it's not you, and you can reach those other users, please tell the one responsible that this is not a good thing to do. If the one responsible reads this: Please stop. -- grm_wnr Esc 16:15, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Of course, if you were to create an account, it would solve all these problems... Alphax ^τεχ 16:20, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chris Bowater

An editor has nominated Chris Bowater, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Bowater and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alun Buffry

The article Alun Buffry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be a vanity page and notability is not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} ^(Whisper...) 15:32, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Koffee Brown

The article Koffee Brown has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:11, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

---