User talk:90.248.204.187

Take care

Please do not accuse other editors of vandalism, as you did in this edit summary, without strong reason. Please read the policy at Wikipedia:Vandalism. Accusing an editor of vandalism when their editing is not clearly vandalism as defined in the policy may be considered to be a personal attack. Making personal attacks may result in you being blocked from editing. Please discuss content disputes on the article talk page (see WP:BRD), and please avoid edit warring. - Donald Albury 16:00, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

• Hi Donald Albury. Thanks for your message. Unfortunately this user has a track record of disruptive behaviour which many of us that edit airport pages in good faith have been victim to. The user's talk page is littered with complaints of edit warring and their pedantic policing of sourcing. You can see that the vast majority of the user's edits are the removal of changes for what they believe to be incorrect sourcing and referencing (many times this is usually controversial sourcing). The user rarely, if ever, makes any attempt to improve the content. Many times the reversions result in information that is clearly incorrect. No effort is made to improve the source, it is always a reversion. I also feel that the user targets other users picking at any edit they make in order to revert it for the sake of reverting. This disruptive behaviour has been reported to the Wiki Admins. A couple of weeks ago the behaviour and edit warring resulted in Dublin Airport page being putting in special protection so nobody can edit it. I would hate this to happen to Orlando International Airport as it disrupts everyone trying to make the Wiki content and community better.90.248.204.187 (talk) 16:31, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

---