User talk:A. Dittel

Reply

Thanks for message. English Wikipedia is independent of other languages and has different and usually stricter rules.

Thank you for stating that you have no conflict of interest, but please read the guidance below:

When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

You had no inline references of any kind, just two bare urls at the bottom of the page

He might well be notable, but even on the unsupported facts you give, that's not obvious.

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

Like on of the pioniers [sic]...He is especially renowned... published more than 200 articles/ book chapters... well known for a standard book...

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources.

I'm prepared in principle to restore as a draft, but you say I have not cited many sources in the current version of the article, but I will improve in the future Please clarify. It's clearly not suitable for article space as it stands, and we don't keep drafts indefinitely Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply and your advice. I have done a quick research on Karel Lewit and added several articles to the german version, which proof that he is accepted as an "pionier" in the field of "Manuelle Medizin" (manual medicine). Please restore the article or a draft, so i can complement the former version. Thanks, A. Dittel (talk) 20:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restored as draft, I made these changes Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:31, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that the new version is more suitable. MfG, A. Dittel (talk) 17:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]