User talk:ABC·!·XYZ

This is ABC·!·XYZ's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Law & Economics LAB (October 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Law & Economics LAB and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Law & Economics LAB, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 22:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: Dear DGG, many thanks for your feedback. In this regard: 1. references' pages were already provided. 2. on Wikipedia, there are pages of research institutes similar to ours (even smaller and and their pages are not detailed as our Wikipedia page, which we wrote ad-hoc only for Wikipedia). We would be extremely grateful to you if you could approve the page. Many thanks for your kind cooperation.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ParisRome2020 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: Suspect the previous ping didn't work as lacked a signature, so FYI. :) Best, Darren-M talk 22:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: As kindly requested, we added several more references.ParisRome2020 (talk) 23:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Law & Economics LAB (October 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a directory listing, not an encyclopedia article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Law & Economics LAB and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Law & Economics LAB, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 03:07, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To explain a little further than the standard template: I decided to decline, not reject, to give you a chance to improve it If you decide to try to improve it, articles on such organizations even when they are notable do not include list of staff members, or the books they've published All this iscontent for your web page, not an encyclopedia . I will let someone else review it the next time, but if it is approved in naythign like the current form I or someone will probably send it for a deletion idscussion, and the community will decide.

In any case, there are many hundred thousand articles in WP accepted in earlier years when the standards were lower that we need to either upgrade or remove. The least we can do is not add to them. DGG ( talk ) 03:16, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

notableomore

@DGG: Thanks, we followed all your indications. ParisRome2020 (talk) 09:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "we"? Each account must be exclusively operated by a single individual. 331dot (talk) 09:40, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: Sorry, it is operated only by me. ParisRome2020 (talk) 09:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The question remains, who is "we"? Do you represent an organization? 331dot (talk) 09:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. ParisRome2020 (talk) 09:47, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You used we for a reason. 331dot (talk) 09:49, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's apparent from your global contributions that English may not be your first language. In English there are four principal reasons to refer to yourself as "we" :-

You're a group of people (the most common reason)
You're God
You're Elizabeth II or some other monarch
You're a poseur
I'll concede a fifth reason, that it may not sound as pretentious in your native language, and you were unaware how bad it seems in English.

Which reason is it in your case? Cabayi (talk) 10:40, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Law & Economics LAB (October 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Snowycats was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is a directory listing, not an encyclopedia article. Please reach out to the helpdesk if you would like to pursue this topic further.

Snowycats (talk) 04:03, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Law & Economics LAB[edit]

Hello, ParisRome2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Law & Economics LAB, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Law & Economics LAB[edit]

Hello ParisRome2020,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Law & Economics LAB for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DanCherek (talk) 03:35, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, ABC·!·XYZ. Thank you for your work on La grande corsa verso Lupionòpolis. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:43, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]