User talk:AHujeirat

February 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at User:AHujeirat. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator.

Your autobiography which you originally created on your user page is now located here: Draft:Ahmad A. Hujeirat —Alalch E. 12:38, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop trying to add references to your own work. Read WP:COI. Looking at your Google scholar profile, you appear to only be a minor academic with relatively few citations, so there is no reason to think your opinion is relevant to include. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:22, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please advice me what is wrong with my contribution: A new article is published with new reselts to draw the attention of readers that there is another approach...

What is wrong with that?

Why are you trying to attack me personally and humiltate me by saying:

1) you appear to only be a minor academic

2) here is no reason to think your opinion is relevant to include

3) An obscure scientist

4) much of which doesn't have anything to do with astrophysics

5) who is vain enough that he deserves to be mentioned by name in the article ...

It is clear that these critics have nothing to do with scientific quality of contributions (: what I wrote were not more than two lines), but they are personally motivated and discreminating, though I never met you or attacked personally.

Please have a look here to see my astrophysical contributions:

https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/search/q=Hujeirat&sort=date%20desc%2C%20bibcode%20desc&p_=0

I am looking forward to solving the conflicht with you... AHujeirat (talk) 23:38, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: I received no response at all. Please let us try to find out how to proceed! AHujeirat (talk) 17:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the draft AHujeirat (talk) 22:45, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for that: there was misunderstanig. Please remove the draft asap or at least let me how to remove it AHujeirat (talk) 23:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will greatly appreciate having you opinion on Hemiauchenia accusation, because

they are personally motivateda nd not correct AHujeirat (talk) 23:43, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: I would like to write create a page explaining the the H-metric in cosmology.

Could you please help me to create the page!

As I said, I am university professor and researcher (see:

(https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/search/q=Hujeirat&sort=date%20desc%2C%20bibcode%20desc&p_=0

and

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmad_A._Hujeirat).

Looking forward! AHujeirat (talk) 17:53, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:29, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I need protection as the Wikipedia user "Hemiauchenia" uses this platform to spread insulting, discriminating and humiliating argumments against me that are completely

have no whatsoever basis, e.g.

1) "you appear to only be a minor academic"

2) "here is no reason to think your opinion is relevant to include"

3) "An obscure scientist"

4) "much of which doesn't have anything to do with astrophysics"

5) "who is vain enough that he deserves to be mentioned by name in the article" ...

These arguments are unfair, as you can easily verify the scientific quality of my astrophysical contributions:

https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/search/q=Hujeirat&sort=date%20desc%2C%20bibcode%20desc&p_=0

I offered the user to invite two Wikipedia experts and I will ask two experts in astrophysics and cosmology to discuss the arguments of the user in detail.

Wikipedia should not allow users to use the platform to insult other users, an in particular not well-established scientists.... AHujeirat (talk) 12:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]