User talk:ANJPL

Welcome!

Hello, ANJPL, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Meelar (talk) 00:44, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

If you think someone is a sock then you make an SPI report. You do not have the authority to make edits like this which constitute a personal attack. --Snowded ^TALK 01:30, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are defending a known banned sockpuppet. What are your motives? ANJPL (talk) 01:32, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Make an SPI report if you think that is the case. Its not something that you can determine. Failure to make a sock puppet report indicates that you don't have any evidence but are just trying to stir up trouble. Of course if you do make a report your own behaviour comes under investigation. --Snowded ^TALK 01:36, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh don't worry, we will make the report eventually, unless some good admin comes along and does the job for us. But there are some more investigations to make first. You sound quite worried that we WILL make the report Snowden. I wonder why? ANJPL (talk) 01:40, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"We" is an interesting statement. The sooner you make the report the better, if you have evidence it can then be considered. For the moment your constant attacks on other editors are disruptive. If you want to build evidence then do so in a sandbox (as I am) and then present it when its ready. Do not issue accusations on talk pages or in edit summaries without evidence or making the report --Snowded ^TALK 01:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you keep giving evidence by defending your sockpuppets, then I have every duty to highlight that to warn unsuspecting editors. Keep it up. Its just more evidence against you! ANJPL (talk) 01:46, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another personal attack I see. I've never run a sock puppet, but if you think I have then you report it so it can be investigated. It will take you two minutes and I will support the investigation. If you make continued personal attacks without a proper report then it goes to ANI (it will probably go there anyway given your behaviour) --Snowded ^TALK 01:50, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You state "I have never run a sockpuppet". Thanks for that. Keep the evidence coming. Its all good stuff. ANJPL (talk) 01:54, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]