||This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Entropy.
Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Distributed denial of service attacks on root nameservers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ICMP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Editing Fock state
Hi, exactly which part did you find non-constructive? If you kindly let me know on the talk page of Fock state, then I can answer your doubts. Indranil1993 (talk) 10:39, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Well, I think you've made a mistake, because, the edits I did were to make the page more informative and correct. The definition of Fock state was not correct in the page, I had to edit that (and to support the edits I gave reliable sources, you can look up to check or I can explain if you want). Then I added the sections Fermionic Fock states. You know, you haven't undid my edits on Bosonic Fock state. So, I think adding Fermionic Fock state was also required (here also I've added as many reliable sources I could find). Can you please confirm me, that these are the edits you really wanted to make? Indranil1993 (talk) 10:54, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Why I trust Wikipedia
On the page User:Entropy/Why I trust Wikipedia, what do you think about changing this...
- Articles about very specific or complex topics are often fitted with a template stating they are [[Category:Miscellaneous_articles_needing_expert_attention|in need of attention from an expert]].
by inserting a colon between [[ and "Category"? This will remove the page from the category listing. Iceblock (talk) 21:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the suggestion, I've removed it from the category. —Entropy (talk) 04:39, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! Iceblock (talk) 16:36, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
I added the informations that most humans are heterosexual and that's true. Gay or bisexual people are on the less side. Why isn't my contribution to this article accepted? Opo Chano (talk) 00:14, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- If you see the section later on that page called Behavioral studies, note the part that says "the majority of humans have had both heterosexual and homosexual experiences or sensations and are bisexual". But even that is beside the point; you added a potentially controversial, unsourced statement to the opening section of the page. I don't see that as constructive so I removed it. —Entropy (talk) 00:19, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Ok but somehow I believe that it's a nonsense that there is a statement in this article that every human is bisexual in fact. I'll never feel attracted to humans who has the same gender as me for example. Opo Chano (talk) 00:25, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- My point is that your edit didn't contribute to the article, it just inserted an unsourced controversial statement, so I undid it. —Entropy (talk) 00:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to understand why you reverted my edits. The overwhelming majority of active and inactive players listed on this page have references to external pages corroborating their information. Why remove the references I added? Why not remove all of the references and not just the ones I added?
With regard to Will Hill and Janoris Jenkins, why did you delete the entries relating to their careers in the NFL? The information relating to them is exactly the purpose of this page as they are former players at the University of Florida who now play in the NFL. 
With regard to Deonte Thompson, why did you change accurate information about his status relating to the Baltimore Ravens and Buffalo Bills back to inaccurate information? Thompson was with the Ravens from 2012-2014. Relegated to the Ravens' practice squad, he was signed by the Bills in December of 2014 and played one game for the Bills before the end of the season and remains with the Bills.  Just because the information doesn't match his personal page doesn't make it wrong, especially in light of more authoritative sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CAFLNHDC (talk • contribs) 00:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'm new at the whole wiki editing thing. Sorry if I mixed up some the edits by you and someone else. Thanks for looking into my comments though. Appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CAFLNHDC (talk • contribs)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)