User talk:Acctorp

Welcome!

Hello, Acctorp, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sam Vimes 21:06, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Longevity claims[edit]

Acctorp, unless Wikipedia wants to list the 940+ verified 110+ cases, I do strongly suggest not adding longevity claims below age 113. They are far too numerous. Note the 'oldest people' lists generally have a top-10 list, and the list generally goes down to 112 1/2 at the lowest, more often age 113. If someone claims to be 110 and doesn't have the documents, that's not yet encyclopedic-worthy.→ R Young {^yakł_talk} 22:43, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tory Steele[edit]

Since you're a trusted editor, I'll take your word on this gay pornographic actor, but if you want it to stay, it should probably have a source, because "gay pornographic actors" are, as you know, among the favorite creations of vandals, and someone will probably remove it before long without checking the history. Best, Xoloz 20:24, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lowell N. Johnson[edit]

Where does he come from all of a sudden, dear friend? Bartje 21:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

I gleaned this from a local Moline Ill media outlet: http://qconline.com/archives/qco/sections.cgi?prcss=display&id=279514 Acctorp 03:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But this is apparently only for paying users. Bartje 22:20, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Try: http://www.wqad.com/Global/story.asp?S=4617499&nav=1sW7 Acctorp 03:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, dear friend (correction: Hileman died last year, not last month). Bartje 09:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Paul Reinman[edit]

Thanks very much for your help on this, tracking down an important bio fact that I could not. I'm sorry to hear Reinman has not been with us for sometime; what with Gerald Ford being 93, and Creig Flessel being in his 90s, I was hoping this Silver Age witness might still be around. How did you find it? --Tenebrae 14:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found him in the Social Security Death Index[1]; apparently he retired down to West Palm Beach. Acctorp 22:45, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 75.178.191.15 lifted or expired. Sorry for the trouble!

Request handled by: Luna Santin 23:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Itche Goldberg[edit]

Please don't list Itche Goldberg as having died without a valid reference. alt.obituaries is not a reliable source, and there are zero references for him at news.google.com. User:Zoe|(talk) 04:14, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]