User talk:Adam Rybczynski

Perryville Tree Engravings

Hello Adam Rybczynski and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for creating the Perryville Tree engravings article. It is an interesting topic. I went ahead and did a little bit of cleanup but I just want to warn you that other editors might want to delete it because it needs more third-party, verifiable references. I don't want to see it get deleted.

I also added the article to the List of trees.

A couple of things that might might be useful:

Latitude and longitude of the area where the trees can be found (many articles make use of this). See Template:Coord for more info.
For the images, it would be better for the historical record if you added in the caption the date that the photos were taken.
More third-party references. These don't necessarily have to be online; you could cite a book or magazine too, as long as the citation is accurate.

If you have questions about Wikipedia in general, please feel free to respond here or on my talk page. —Diiscool (talk) 16:45, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I came across Perryville Tree engravings as part of the March copyediting project. It seems there hasn't been any effort to add additional sources. Adam - can you let me know if you plan to add some? Otherwise it should be nominated for deletion. Thanks! Arbor8 (talk) 21:59, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Concord Point Light has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://hdghistory.wordpress.com/.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]